Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Senior Portfolio Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Senior Portfolio Rubric
Senior Portfolio Rubric
University Learning Senior Criminal Justice Portfolio
Rubric Code:
PAXAC3
By
craigali
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Preface
excellent
10 pts
Really Good
9 pts
Fair
7 pts
minimal
5 pts
Peer/Instructor Mark
(N/A)
Ideas/Content
excellent
Has a clear focus and include relevant details and examples, which have been elaborated upon. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Really Good
Has a focus and include details and examples with elaboration. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made some connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Fair
Needs to focus reflection more clearly on learning and subject content. Needs to expand use of details and examples.
minimal
Ideas? You mean I have to think about this?
Peer/Instructor Mark
Organization
excellent
Organizes and links ideas into a logical sequence with an introduction, body and conclusion. Pulls reader into the writing. Uses transitions skillfully. Effectively blends narration and reflection.
Really Good
Organizes ideas into a logical sequence with an introduction, body and conclusion. Uses transitions to link ideas. Blends narration and reflection.
Fair
Attempts to organize ideas into an introduction, body and conclusion. Uses some transitions to link ideas. Tries to blend narration and reflection.
minimal
Organization? Very weak.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Style
excellent
Uses vivid language and a highly effective variety of sentence structures. Maintains a consistent tone and point of view. Voice is reflective.
Really Good
Uses a variety of sentence structures and effective word choice. Maintains a point of view. Voice is reflective.
Fair
Uses imprecise and repetitive word choice. Uses a limited variety of sentences. Tries to maintain a consistent tone. Needs to work on reflective voice.
minimal
Voice? What’s that?
Peer/Instructor Mark
Mechanics x1
excellent
There are very few or no errors in spelling or punctuation.
Work requires little or no editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a good measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Really Good
There are few errors in spelling or punctuation.
Work requires some editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a fair measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Fair
There are some errors in spelling and punctuation.
Work requires a lot of editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a poor measure of how students met the course learning objectives
minimal
There are many errors in spelling and punctuation.
Work requires significant editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are an inadequate measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Peer/Instructor Mark
Conclusion
Ideas/content
excellent
Has a clear focus and include relevant details and examples, which have been elaborated upon. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Includes thoughts about how you have developed during the year and plans for the future.
Includes a challenge for yourself.
Really Good
Has a focus and include details and examples with elaboration. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made some connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Fair
Needs to focus reflection more clearly on learning and subject content. Needs to expand use of details and examples.
minimal
Includes no challenge, or significant reflection on the subject or one own work or future.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Style
excellent
Uses vivid language and a highly effective variety of sentence structures. Maintains a consistent tone and point of view. Voice is reflective.
Really Good
Uses a variety of sentence structures and effective word choice. Maintains a point of view. Voice is reflective.
Fair
Uses imprecise and repetitive word choice. Uses a limited variety of sentences. Tries to maintain a consistent tone. Needs to work on reflective voice.
minimal
Voice? What’s that?
Peer/Instructor Mark
Instructor Use only
Turn in
excellent
On time or early
Really Good
After deadline but still available for peer review.
Fair
Late forcing peer to work late.
minimal
Late forcing peer to work late.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Zero - Not turned in
Peer review
excellent
Provided excellent, very thorough and constructive feedback.
Feedback enabled student to edit and improve their grade.
Really Good
Provided feedback that enabled student to improve grade. Was thorough but not excellent.
Fair
Gave feedback but it was not thorough, not always constructive and/or not much better than editing it themselves.
minimal
Was a little rude, or left huge gaps in the peer review, student is hoping not to get this person again.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Did not do a review for this chapter.
Total Look
Layout
excellent
Excellent
Design is very attractive and shows great creativity.
Consistent format extends from page-to-page; portfolio design is intentional.
The portfolio demonstrates careful thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out so as not to waste space or appear too crowded.
Really Good
Design is attractive and shows some creativity.
Some inconsistencies in format page-to-page; portfolio design appears intentional
The portfolio demonstrates some thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out with some wasted space or appear somewhat crowded.
Fair
Design is somewhat attractive and shows little creativity.
Somewhat consistent format from page-to-page; portfolio design appears fairly random.
The portfolio demonstrates little thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out wasting some space &/or appear crowded.
minimal
Design is unattractive and shows no creativity.
Inconsistent format from page-to-page; portfolio design is random
The portfolio demonstrates no thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out to waste space &/or appear too crowded.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Extra points for Print Ready Books
Contents
excellent
Contains all the elements of the final project:
1-Cover
2-Dedication
3-Title Page
4-Preface
5-Table of Contents
6-Chapters
7-Conclusion
8-Work Cited
Really Good
Missing one element
Fair
missing 2 elements
minimal
Missing 3 or more elements
Peer/Instructor Mark
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.