Skip to main content
iRubric: Producing and Evaluating a Re-Designed Product rubric

iRubric: Producing and Evaluating a Re-Designed Product rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Producing and Evaluating a Re-Designed Product 
Outcome 2
Rubric Code: PAW9X8
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Not Shown

1 pts

Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Finished Product

Not Shown

Product was incomplete with minimal to no motivation to finish the product.
Poor

Product was unfinished ie. unpressed, loose threads, visible pencil marks or visible machine marks.
Fair

Product was roughly finished due to lack of time at the end. Little care was taken during the production process resulting in a poor quality garment. Simple processes were used.
Good

Product was finished on time and to a relatively high standard, though some areas could be completed better. Technical competence has been shown in a range of processses.
Excellent

Product was finished on time and to a high standard. High levels of technical competence has been shown in a wide range of processses included.
Sustainability

Not Shown

The product is not sustainable in any way.
Poor

The re-design product has a minimal sustainable element incorporated into it. No research or evidence was provided on the products sustainability.
Fair

The re-designed product is slightly sustainable. Minimal evidence is included to suggest the products sustainability.
Good

The re-designed product is reasonably sustainabile compared to the original product with some evidence included to support the product.
Excellent

The re-designed product has a strong element of sustainability included. Student has inclduded thorough research and evidence to support the products sustainability.
Product Journal

Not Shown

No production journal was kept.
Poor

Progress was not recorded continuously with minimal to no photographic evidence.
Fair

Progress was occassionally recorded with some photographic evidence. Technical language was used occassionally though appropriately.
Good

Progress was recorded briefly with some photographic evidence. Any modifications were explained. Technical language was used appropriately.
Excellent

Progress was recorded continuously with photographic support. Any modifications explained in detail. Technical language was included and used appropriately.
Evaluation & Comparison

Not Shown

No evaluation or comparison was made.
Poor

Evaluation of the finished product is brief and has been rushed due to lack of time.
Effective evaluation criteria was never delveloped and therefore were unable to fullfil this criterion.
Fair

Student has briefly evaluated the finished product using their evaluation criteria. Slight comparison was made from the original product. No areas of improvement were mentioned.
Good

Student has evaluated the product using the evaluation criteria. Areas of improvement have been briefly noted. A comparison to the orginal product has been made.
Excellent

Student has successfully evaluated the product using the evaluation criteria. Areas of improvement have been noted. A strong comparison to the original product has been made.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232