iRubric: Dante's Inferno Term Essay rubric

The student's writing reflects an insightful and deep understanding of the use of Allegory. All requirements are met, going above and beyond the basic requirements. Overall the analysis reflects a deep understanding of the text as well as the assignment.

The student's analysis reflects an average understanding of the use of Allegory. All requirements are met, reflecting a basic understanding of the text as well as the assignment.

The student's analysis does not reflect a basic understanding of the use of Allegory. Problem areas could be in the understanding of the text and/or the assignment. One or two requirements are either left out or completely lacking in an understanding of the text and/or assignment.

The student's analysis and understanding of Allegory is lacking in many or all areas of the text and/or assignment. Many requirements are missing or lacking in understanding. Overall, the analysis may reflect a lack of effort or understanding in all areas.

All aspects of the assignment show a sophisticated word choice. Word choice is precise with effective use of transitions. Sentence structure is varied. Word choice and sentence structure help add to the sophistication and depth of the analysis.

All aspects of the assignment show a basic and appropriate word choice. Word choice is precise and most transitions are used effectively. Most sentences are varied, with no awkward sentences that get in the way of clarity and meaning of writing.

At several points in the project, some aspects show appropriate word choice, but some parts reveal a limited choice of words. Word choice is not always appropriate, and some transitions are not used correctly or more are needed. Sentence structure shows some variation but are limited in structure. There is evidence of confusing sentences that do not immediately convey writer's meaning.

Many aspects of the project show little evidence of appropriate word choice. In addition, few transitions are used and/or used incorrectly. Sentence structure is limited and/or written in a confusing manner, consequently getting in the way of the meaning of the writing.

Skillfull Structure:
Strong engaging introduction; logical and effective sequencing of ideas linked to thesis; Conclusion gives closure and stongly reinforces thesis.

Appropriate Structure:
Engaging intro; logical sequencing; conclusion reinforces thesis, some closure.

Weak Structure:
Introduction, body and/or conclusion may need more revision; evidence may be just isolated facts with weak sequencing.

Little or No Structure