Complete, concise, and well organized presentation of material. No prompting required to elaborate on material.
5 pts
Well organized, partial but accurate information. Requires little prompting.
4 pts
Organization needs work, limited amount of pertinent information provided or information inaccurate. Requires some prompting
3 pts
Poorly organized, missing and/or inaccurate information. Requires significant prompting / leading for information
2 pts
Not addressed, grossly incomplete and/or inaccurate. Requires preceptor or other students to provide all information
1 pts
Presentation or paper is within allotted time or length (20 minutes)
Completely follows the accepted oral or written format
Speaks or writes clearly without errors in pronunciation, spelling, and/or grammar
Speaks with confidence, eye contact, and interacts with the audience OR writes with engaging style
Speaks or writes in language appropriate for the target audience
Able to answer all questions accurately and within allotted time
Provides audience with pertinent background information about topicdiscussed in journal article (epidemiology, risk factors, etc.)
Provides quick overview of other studies available including comparision of study populations, methodology, areas for improvement relative to study presenting
Brief summary (overview) of journal article before performing analysis (citation, funding, impact of journal, peer reviewed, hypothesis/null hypothesis, study design, endpoints etc)
Characteristics of study population presented (inclusion,exclusion, ITT), explained potential influence of excluded population on results
Summarizes and critiques interventions and methods (Logical? Sufficient detail? Consistent with current practice? Based on standard methods or published/validated scales/measures?
Summarizes and critiques relevant results and discusses statistical and clinical significance (baseline characteristics? External validity? Patient withdrawal? ITT, per-protocol, or other analysis?)
Stated and assessed if valid based on study objectives and results.
Strengths, limitations, bias presented
Articulates whether statistical significance (or lack thereof) correlates with clinical significance and how results can be applied to practice
(N/A)
Not addressed, grossly incomplete and/or inaccurate. Reuires preceptor or other students to provide all information
0 pts
Follows referencing and citation format all of the time