Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Inexcusable Extended Writing rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Inexcusable Extended Writing
Inexcusable Extended Writing
Chris Lynch, the author of Inexcusable, wrote this book using flashbacks causing some confusion for the reader. This style of writing assists the reader in understanding how the character, Keir, seems to be confused and misunderstands Gigi's actions. Using the same style of writing, create a final chapter bringing the story to a more decisive ending.
Rubric Code:
P8B975
By
bdillenburg
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Inexcusable Extended Writing
Excellent
10 pts
Good
7 pts
Needs Improvement
5 pts
Interpretation
Excellent
Interpretation of the character's traits are accurate and based on logical textual evidence continued into written extension.
Good
Interpretation of the characer's traits are mostly accurate and logical continued into written extension
Needs Improvement
Interpretation of the character's traits are inaccurate and based on random ideas.
Author's Craft
Excellent
The writing style strongly and insightfully supports the author's craft
Good
The writing style accurately supports the author's interpretation and writing style.
Needs Improvement
The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and writing style.
Application of Character
Excellent
Character interpretation is extended beyond explanation through detailed elaboration. A conclusion is made and explained sufficiently to connect character to plot.
Good
Interpretation is extended through brief elaboration and connected to plot, but the explanation is unclear and difficult to understand.
Needs Improvement
Interpretation is not extended beyond the explanation and support. No connection is made to plot, or connection does not follow logically from character interpretation.
Mechanics/MLA format
Excellent
Fewer than three mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.
Good
Fewer than five mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.
Needs Improvement
Mechanical errors interfere with readability of paper. Little or no MLA format criteria used.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Reading
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.