- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Inexcusable Extended Writing rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Inexcusable Extended Writing Inexcusable Extended Writing Chris Lynch, the author of Inexcusable, wrote this book using flashbacks causing some confusion for the reader. This style of writing assists the reader in understanding how the character, Keir, seems to be confused and misunderstands Gigi's actions. Using the same style of writing, create a final chapter bringing the story to a more decisive ending. Rubric Code: P8B975 By bdillenburg Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Inexcusable Extended Writing
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 7 pts	Needs Improvement 5 pts
Interpretation	Excellent Interpretation of the character's traits are accurate and based on logical textual evidence continued into written extension.	Good Interpretation of the characer's traits are mostly accurate and logical continued into written extension	Needs Improvement Interpretation of the character's traits are inaccurate and based on random ideas.
Author's Craft	Excellent The writing style strongly and insightfully supports the author's craft	Good The writing style accurately supports the author's interpretation and writing style.	Needs Improvement The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and writing style.
Application of Character	Excellent Character interpretation is extended beyond explanation through detailed elaboration. A conclusion is made and explained sufficiently to connect character to plot.	Good Interpretation is extended through brief elaboration and connected to plot, but the explanation is unclear and difficult to understand.	Needs Improvement Interpretation is not extended beyond the explanation and support. No connection is made to plot, or connection does not follow logically from character interpretation.
Mechanics/MLA format	Excellent Fewer than three mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.	Good Fewer than five mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.	Needs Improvement Mechanical errors interfere with readability of paper. Little or no MLA format criteria used.