- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Timeline Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Timeline Rubric Timeline Rubric Basic Rubric for evaluation of a single timeline or multiple timelines on the same paper. Rubric Code: P5X35A By prissy09 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Assignment Grade Levels: (none)

Timeline
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts
Chronology	Excellent All events arranged chronologically.	Good Most events arranged chronologically.	Poor Few events arranged chronologically.	Fair Some events arranged chronologically.
Labeling/Directions	Excellent Each event has a date and label. Each event is capitalized and punctuated appropriately.	Good Has most events dated and labeled. Has a few errors in grammar.	Poor Has few events dated and/or labeled.	Fair Has some events dated and labeled.
Neatness	Excellent Shows careful thought & planning. Understandable. Legible. Neat. Has some "pop" or eye appeal.	Good Shows thought & planning. Mostly: Understandable. Legible. Neat. Has a proper heading of all group members.	Poor Appears rushed, sloppy or careless. Difficult to read clearly or understand.	Fair Difficult to read. Sloppy. Shows little thought and planning.
Details/Implications	Excellent Gives appropriate details and thoughtful implications of events, using drawings and detailed pictures of events.	Good Gives details and implications of events, using drawings or printed pictures.	Poor Gives no details or implications of events	Fair Gives little detail and poor analysis of implications of events
Team Work	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.	Good The group worked well with each other and communicated well/ Some members participated slightly more than others.	Poor Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.	Fair The group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.