iRubric: TV Production Project rubric

Student did not hand in a treatment or the treatment was poorly developed and very short. Storyboards left out shots/scenes and did not include sufficient dialogue or music suggestions. Scripts were not written for characters with dialogue.

Student treatment explained the project. Storyboards adequately covered the content of the program with varied shots (wide, mediium, close up and extreme close up) and included sufficient dialogue and music suggestions. Scripts were written and copied for each actor.

Student treatment explained the project in detail. Storyboards were clear and interesting with many varied shots (wide, mediium, close up and extreme close up) and included extensive dialogue and music suggestions. Well written scripts were copied for each character with spoken lines.

Sound quality was poor, inappropriate and/or confusing. Movie contained background noise.

Most sound and dialogue were necessary and effective. No background noise evident.

Excellent use of dialogue and sound which enhanced and advanced the program. All edits were crisp and seamless.

Little variation in types of shots. Shots were not framed correctly. Shaky camera, poor lighting, and little imagination used. Camera work included too many pans and zooms.

The shots were varied (wide, medium, close up, xcu) and well framed. Steady shots, adequate lighting, interesting angles evident. Camera work did not distract from the program.

The shots were interesting and varied (wide, medium, close up, xcu) and extremely well framed. Steady shots, advanced lighting, and many interesting and innovative angles evident. Camera work was excellent.