Skip to main content

iRubric: Agricultural Issues Forum rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Agricultural Issues Forum 
FFA Conduct of Meetings
Rubric Code: P5339C
By teamaged
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Agricultural Issues Forum
Enter rubric description
  Poor

(N/A)

Struggling

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Striving

(N/A)

Oustanding

(N/A)

Introduction of Issue

Introductory Statement of the Issue and its
importance to agriculture.
Poor

Introduction of the issue was NOT thorough. Pros and cons were not equally introduced.

Introduction of the issue was NOT thorough.

Pros and cons were NOT equally introduced.

Introduction was NOT concise.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling

Introduction of the issue was NOT thorough. Pros and cons were not equally introduced.

Introduction was NOT concise.

(2 PTS.)
Good

Introduction of the issue was thorough. Pros and cons were briefly explained. Pros and cons were NOT equally introduced.

Introduction was concise.


(3 PTS.)
Striving

Introduction of the issue was thorough. Pros and cons were equally introduced.

Introduction was NOT a concise as it could have been.

(4 PTS.)
Oustanding

Introduction of the issue was thorough. Pros and cons were equally introduced.

Introduction was understandable and concise.

(5 PTS.)
Pro View Point

Poor

Team made few or no accurate statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(1 PTS.)
Struggling

Team made a few accurate statements, and a few INACCURATE statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(2 PTS.)
Good

Team made a few accurate statements, and at least one INACCURATE statement about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(3 PTS.)
Striving

Team made a few accurate statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture

(4 PTS.)
Oustanding

Team made several accurate AND concise statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(5 PTS.)
Con View Point

Poor

Team made few or no accurate statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(1 PTS.)
Struggling

Team made a few accurate statements, and a few INACCURATE statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(2 PTS.)
Good

Team made a few accurate statements, and at least one INACCURATE statement about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(3 PTS.)
Striving

Team made a few accurate statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture

(4 PTS.)
Oustanding

Team made several accurate AND concise statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.

(5 PTS.)
Summary of Pro and Con Viewpoints

Poor

Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were NOT presented as related to agriculture.

Several opinions were expressed.

(1 pts.)
Struggling

Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were NOT presented as related to agriculture.

One or more opinions were expressed.

(2 pts.)
Good

Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were presented as related to agriculture.

One or more opinions were expressed.

(3 pts.)
Striving

Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were presented as related to agriculture.

Expressed some implication of a conclusion. (4 pts.)
Oustanding

Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were thoroughly and concisely presented as related to agriculture.

At no time did the team allow their opinion(s) to be expressed or no implication of a conclusion.

(5 pts.)
Documentation of Facts

Poor

No statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.

Al or most 'facts' were expressed as opinion.

(1 PTS.)
Struggling

Very few statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.

Several 'facts' were expressed as opinion.

(2 PTS.)
Good

A MINORITY of statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.

(3 PTS.)
Striving

A MAJORITY of statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.

(4 PTS.)
Oustanding

All statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.

(5 PTS.)
Voice and Expression

Poor

None of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling

Few of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good

Some of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Some of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving

Most of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Most of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(7-8 PTS.)
Oustanding

All team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(9-10 PTS.)
Questions

Poor

Answered few or no questions correctly.

Did not respond without significant hesitation.

(1 PTS.)
Struggling

Answered most questions correctly.

Responded with significant hesitation.

(2 PTS.)
Good

Answered most questions correctly.

Responded with some hesitation.

(3 PTS.)
Striving

Answered most questions correctly.

Responded with little hesitation.

(4 PTS.)
Oustanding

Answered all questions correctly.

Responded with no hesitation.

(5 PTS.)




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202