Skip to main content
iRubric: Instructor Review: Narrative Essay rubric

iRubric: Instructor Review: Narrative Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Instructor Review: Narrative Essay 
Rubric Code: P44844
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Instructor Review
  Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Needs Improvement

(N/A)

Review Score

(N/A)

Date of Submission

Good

Submitted to the instructor on the assigned date.
Fair

One class day late.
Needs Improvement

Two class days late.
Review Score
MLA Format & Length

Good

The writer followed all MLA Format requirements and the length of the essay is at least 500 words (2 pages) typed.
Fair

The writer followed most of the MLA Format requirements and the essay is at least 500 words (2 pages) typed.
Needs Improvement

The writer did not meet most of the MLA Format requirements and the essay is less than 500 words (2 pages) typed.
Review Score
Title

Does the title fit the story?

Good

Yes
Fair

Somewhat
Needs Improvement

No
Review Score
Introduction

Good

The introduction contains an attention-grabbing opening statements that lead to a thesis statement.

Introduction includes a brief explanation as to the particular theme/basis for the story (NF) or a brief explanation as to the genre you have selected for the story (F).
Fair

The introduction contains some attention-grabbing opening statements that lead to a thesis statement.

Introduction somewhat includes a brief explanation as to the particular theme/basis for the story (NF) or a brief explanation as to the genre you have selected for the story (F).
Needs Improvement

The introduction has few if any attention-grabbing statements and/or the attention-grabbing statements do not clearly lead to the thesis statement/topic.

Introduction does not include a brief explanation as to the particular theme/basis for for the story (NF) or a brief explanation as to the genre you have selected for the story (F), and/or it was not addressed effectively.
Review Score
Thesis Statement

Good

The thesis statement clearly and concisely presents the topic and the main idea of the narrative.

The thesis statement is placed correctly.
Fair

The thesis statement is vague in how it presents the topic and/or the main idea.

The thesis statement may not be placed correctly.
Needs Improvement

There is no clear thesis statement.
Review Score
Creativity and Originality

Good

The concept and presentation of the narrative story is very creative and original.
Fair

The concept and presentation of the narrative story is somewhat creative and original.
Needs Improvement

The narrative story lacks creativity and originality.
Review Score
Sequencing & Organization

Good

Details are placed in a chronological order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.

The essay includes five distinct paragraphs: Introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion that follows the story plot structural format exactly.
Fair

Some details may not be in a chronological order, and this distracts the reader.

The essay includes five paragraphs: Introduction, three body paragraphs, and conclusion; however, they may not be entirely presented in the story plot structural format.
Needs Improvement

Many details are not in a chronological order. There is little sense that the writing is organized and/or the essay does not include five paragraphs that present the story in the story plot structural format.
Review Score
Body: Focus & Support

Good

Each body paragraph contains a definite topic sentence with sufficient supporting details that clearly support the thesis statement and assignment.
Fair

Each body paragraph has a topic sentence with some details that support the thesis statement and assignment.
Needs Improvement

The paragraphs do not contain a topic sentence and/or contains a random collection of information that does not support the thesis statement and assignment.
Review Score
Transitions

(Organization)

Good

A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how the ideas are connected.
Fair

Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are unclear.
Needs Improvement

The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant.
Review Score
Description

Use of descriptive words (verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc.)

Good

The writer is effective is their use of descriptive words and includes many adjectives throughout the story to make topic seem real and vivid. The essay does a good job of painting a description in the reader's mind.
Fair

The writer uses some descriptive words and includes some adjectives to make topic seem real and vivd. Their essay does an okay job of painting a picture in the reader's mind.
Needs Improvement

The writer did not use any descriptive words. Needs more adjectives to make topic seem real and vivid. Their essay does not paint a picture in the reader's mind.
Review Score
Development

Good

All details relate to character, setting, plot, conflict, and resolution and are handled competently.
Fair

Some details relate to character, setting, plot, conflict, and resolution and are handled competently.
Needs Improvement

Very few, if any, details relate to character, setting, plot, conflict, and resolution and are handled competently.
Review Score
Conclusion

Good
Fair

The conclusion is somewhat effective. It may not summarize the main points (full-circle) or restate the thesis without repeating the exact sentence.

The conclusion may not leave the reader with something to think about.
Needs Improvement
Review Score
Capitalization

The paragraph and all proper nouns within it begin with a capital letter.

Good

All sentences within the paragraph begin with a capital letter and the paragraph has no other capitalization errors.
Fair

The paragraph has 1-2 errors in capitalization.
Needs Improvement

The paragraph does not begin with a capital letter and has more than 2 errors in capitalization.
Review Score
Punctuation

Does the paragraph contain the appropriate ending and other punctuation?

Good

The paragraph contains the correct ending punctuation.
Fair

The paragraph contains a few errors in punctuation.
Needs Improvement

The paragraph contains half or more errors in punctuation.
Review Score
Spelling

How many words are spelled correctly?

Good

All words in the paragraph are spelled correctly.
Fair

The paragraph contains 1-2 misspelled words.
Needs Improvement

The paragraph contains 3 or more misspelled words.
Review Score
Run-ons/CS & Sentence Fragments

(Commas errors/two independent sentences combined) (Not complete sentences)

Good

There are no run-ons, comma splices, or sentence fragments in the paragraph.
Fair

There are a few run-ons, comma splices, and/or sentence fragments in the paragraph.
Needs Improvement

There are many run-ons, comma splices, and/or sentence fragments in the paragraph.
Review Score
Mechanics

(Grammar & Word Choice)

Good

The writer demonstrates proper use of vocabulary that adds to the quality of writing and enhances the overall meaning of the topic.

Very few minor mechanical errors.
Fair

The writer occasionally demostrates proper word choices that add to the quality of writing and enhance the overall meaning of the topic.

Some minor mechanical errors.
Needs Improvement

The writer rarely demostrates proper word choices, causing the reader to become distracted from the topic.

Several major mechanical errors.
Review Score




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60