Skip to main content
iRubric: Copy of VIDEO PROJECT rubric

iRubric: Copy of VIDEO PROJECT rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Copy of VIDEO PROJECT 
Student run video project
Rubric Code: P3C47A
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Video Project
  Poor

3 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

9 pts

Video- camera focus

Poor

Camera shots are incorrect, and/or cameras are frequently out of focus, or shaky.
Fair

Camera shots are occasionaly incorrect or occasionally out of focus.
Good

Camera shots are correct and rarely out of focus.
Camera Shots: (Long, med., CU)

Poor

Project shows 2 or less shot selections
Fair

Project shows 3-5 shot selections, though not much variety in selectison
Good

Project shows 5-7 shot selections, alternating between Long shots, medium shots, and close ups.
Sound-music/other

Poor

Project shows very little, if any sound effects.
Fair

Sound effects are included but are irrelevant or do little to improve overall production.
Good

Sound effects are exceptional, they enhance overall project.
Sound-voice

Poor

Voice of subjects is frequently difficult to hear, either too loud or too soft.
Fair

Voice of subject is occasionaly too loud or too soft.
Good

Voice of subject is perfect.
Lighting

Poor

Lighting appears either too dark or too bright thoughout much of the production.
Fair

Lighting appears adequate through most of project, though there are some imperfections.
Good

Lighting throughout project is exceptional.
Storyline

Poor

Story lacks clear direction; does not have clear start and end point.
Fair

Story has some direction, but may be lacking clear message.
Good

Story delivers clear, defined message.
Storyboard

Poor

Story rarely follows path as stated in storyboard.
Fair

Story is sometimes aligned with storyboard.
Good

Story is in alignment with storyboard sketch.
Logistics

Poor

Student shows deficiencies in signing out /caring for LCTV equpment.
Fair

Student had one or two lapses when signing out/caring for LCTV equipment.
Good

Student demonstrated complete responsibility for LCTV equipment.
Scheduling

Poor

Student showed glaring weaknesses in scheduling talent, studios, and/or equipment.
Fair

Student showed some responsibility scheduling production, but had some missteps.
Good

Student showed exemplary responsibility scheduling production and studio usage.
Group dynamics

Poor

Student was frequently absent, tardy, or uninvolved with members of group. (double points.)
Fair

Student was sometimes absent, tardy, or uninvolved with members of group. (double points.)
Good

Student was rarely, if ever absent, tardy, or uninvolved with members of group. (double points.)
Format/credits
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

4 pts

Good

(N/A)

Credits

Poor

No credits at conclusion of project
Fair

Credits are visible, but there are spelling errors.
Good

Credits are visible with no spelling errors.
Final format

Poor

Project is not saved in proper format and not turned in on cd/dvd.
Fair

Project is saved appropriately but not labeled or incorrect format.
Good

Project is turned in with participants names on written on disk, as well as saved in proper format.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232