Skip to main content
iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Chapter Website rubric

iRubric: Missouri FCCLA Chapter Website rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Missouri FCCLA Chapter Website 
Missouri FCCLA Digital Stories for Change
This rubric is for the Missouri FCCLA state contest, Chapter Website. The contest is open to Missouri FCCLA members only. Information found at www.mofccla.org
Rubric Code: P38ABC
By MoFCCLA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric MoFCCLA Chapter Website
An individual or team event, recognizes participants who use the Internet to educate, inform, and involve members and the general public about the importance of the family and consumer sicences program and the FCCLA chapter.
 

0 pts


1 pts


2 pts


3 pts


4 pts

Browser
The website must be built to run within a browser. If project did not meet the browser specification, it can be scored, but will receive an automatic 5 point deduction, to be deducted from the final score. Facebook, MySpace, Blogs and other social networking sites or message feeds are not acceptable formats, but these social networking tools may be embedded or used in conjunction with the chapter website. The website may be developed using website services, templates, or software.
Project Identification Page
1 pts

Must be included within the chapter website.
0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included on website.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Missing one or more requirements.
2 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
4 ( x 1 pts)

Includes participant first name and last initial, school, city, state, FCCLA region, theme of website, and target audience.
Use of FCCLA Planning Process
1 pts

Must include within the website the FCCLA planning process summary of how each step of the planning process was used in the project.
0 ( x 1 pts)

Not included.
1 ( x 1 pts)

1 or 2 steps summarized. Planning process relationship to project is weak.
2 ( x 1 pts)

3 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are generally reflected in project.
3 ( x 1 pts)

4 of 5 steps summarized. Planning process results are seen in project.
4 ( x 1 pts)

All 5 steps summarized. Planning process completed and relates to project.
FCCLA and FCS Promotion
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Website is limited in the promotion of FCCLA or FCS education. Reinforces negative stereotypes.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Website promotes either FCCLA or FCS education, but not both. Inconsistent messages about the programs.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Website promotes FCCLA and FCS education, but examples use are inconsistent with the mission or purposes of FCCLA and FCS education.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Website promotes FCCLA and FCS education as important. Use is not moved beyond current expectations of FCCLA or FCS education
4 ( x 1 pts)

Website promotes with enthusiasm FCCLA as the ultimate leadership experience and FCS education as essential for all students. Expands user knowledge and moves beyond expectations.
Navigation
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Navigation is minimal as the site is limited. Links do not work.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Site navigation is difficult. Links are confusing or absent. Many links do not work. Loads very slowly or not at all.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Mostly clear how to navigate the website. Some links do not work. Some scrolling required. Return buttons or links are not well placed. Page elements load slowly.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Navigation is good. Pages and links are easily found. Hyperlinks are prominent and logically placed. Little scrolling is required. Information, return buttons, and links are easily found.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Navigation is well planned. Pages have return links, and all links are easily found, functional, and appropriate. Buttons, text, and images are easily understood. Page elements load quickly and are optimized for users.
Innovative Technology
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

None used.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Innovative technology is attempted, but does not support the project and may not work properly.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Innovative technology is used, works properly, but detracts from the theme or purpose of the website.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Innovative technology is used, supports the theme and purpose, and works properly.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Innovative technology is used to maximize the user's experience with the website. Supports the theme and works properly.
Graphic/Image Commication
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Very few images are used and are not relevant to the project. Graphics are inappropriate for website.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video used do not match the storyline or enrich the project. Images not coordinated with music/sound.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics, images, or video inconsistently used and not clearly matched with the storyline. Images not coordinated with music/sound.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Good use of graphic elements, too much text to read.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Graphics elements enhance and support the presentation of content.
Idea Organization
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas not organized, hard to follow, audience left confused by disorganization.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas lack coherence, consistency and flow, audience makes assumptions to follow.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas mostly coherent but not clearly supported in project flow, portions are hard to follow.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas mostly coherent and organized, project flow is easily followed.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Ideas coherent and effectively organized, project flows seamlessly for audience.
Text
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

Excessive text is used at the expense of other graphic elements and design.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Lengthy text is used; acronyms are not explained or spelled out. User knowledge or jargon is assumed.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Too much text to read, acronyms and jargon inconsistently explained.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Text length is average, somewhat easy to read, acronyms are sometimes spelled out. Jargon sometimes used.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Text length is appropriate, easy to read, acronyms when used are spelled out. Jargon is not used.
Creativity and Design
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No use of color, design, or effects to support the theme of the project.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Color, design and effects distract from the theme. Originality is absent.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Minimal use of color, design, effects and original ideas. Theme not well supported.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Good use of color, design, effects, and original ideas to support theme.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Excellent use of color, design, effects, and originality to maximize theme and ideas.
Website Theme
1 pts

0 ( x 1 pts)

No theme identified.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Theme identified but not applied to website pages.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Theme applied but inconsistent throughout.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Theme generally consistent throughout
4 ( x 1 pts)

Theme consistently applied throughout website pages.
Documentation
1 pts

Any music, photographs, text, trademarks, or names that are used in the project must be properly cited and documented. Must follow copyright and must follow school district rules for student privacy and use of photographs or student work.
0 ( x 1 pts)

No information provided on copyright or source citations.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright is questionable, sources are not cited.
2 ( x 1 pts)

DO NOT USE
3 ( x 1 pts)

Copyright statements and permissions are included, most sources are properly cited.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Work is original, or copyright statements and permissions are included, all sources are documented.
Grammar...
1 pts

Spelling, Punctuation and Capitalization
0 ( x 1 pts)

Inappropriate use of text and words.
1 ( x 1 pts)

Errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation or capitalization (5 or more). Distracts user.
2 ( x 1 pts)

Several errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or capitalization (3-4). May distract user.
3 ( x 1 pts)

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization errors are very minor (1-2). Does not distract user.
4 ( x 1 pts)

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, capitalization are correct.
Evaluator Recommendation
0.5 pts

0 ( x 0.5 pts)

Would not recommend as model without significant changes.
1 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE.
2 ( x 0.5 pts)

Would recommend as model but with suggestions for changes.
3 ( x 0.5 pts)

DO NOT USE.
4 ( x 0.5 pts)

Would recommend as model with no changes.



Keywords:
  • Missouri, FCCLA, Website

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60