iRubric: IEP Writing Rubric/Three Criteria

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
IEP Writing Rubric/Three Criteria IEP Writing Rubric/Two Criteria rubric for scoring students with IEPs writing Rubric Code: P35673 By alkhanfar Draft Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: K-5

IEP Writing Rubric Enter rubric description
	Strong 5 pts	Effective 4 pts	Developing 3 pts	Emerging 2 pts	Experimenting 1 pts
Organization	Strong Excellent introduction and conclusion that invite the reader in then satisfy them with the ending. Excellent sequencing with all events, details, and information given in logical order.	Effective Good introduction and conclusion. Good sequencing with most events, details, and information given in logical order.	Developing Fair introduction and conclusion. Fair sequencing with some events, details, and information given in a logical order.	Emerging Weak introduction and conclusion. Weak sequencing with few of the events, details, and information given in logical order.	Experimenting Poor introduction and conclusion. Poor sequencing with events, details, and information given in a confusing order.
Information/Details	Strong Excellent amount of information and details given that answer all the readers' questions.	Effective Good amount of information and details given that answer most of the readers' questions.	Developing Fair amount of information and details given that answer some of the readers' questions.	Emerging Little information and details given that answer only a few of the readers' questions.	Experimenting Very little information and details given, reader left with many questions.
Conventions	Strong Excellent conventions, paper requires no or very little editing for errors in "CUPS": Capitalization, Usage, Punctuation, Spelling.	Effective Good convention, paper requires light editing for errors in CUPS. Errors don't distract from writing.	Developing Fair conventions, paper requires moderate editing for errors in CUPS. Errors distract from writing.	Emerging Weak conventions, paper requires heavy editing for errors in CUPS. Errors sometimes make writing difficult to read.	Experimenting Poor conventions, paper requires major editing for errors in CUPS. Errors make writing difficult to read.