Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The Anatomy Game rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The Anatomy Game
The Cell Geame
Create a board game with visuals to help increase student practice and understanding of tissues and anatomical terminology. This is due on September 30 and students will play all the games to assist with grading this project
Rubric Code:
P3377C
By
coachltlbit
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
The Anatomy Game Project
Poor
3 pts
Fair
6 pts
Above Average
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Organization
Poor
The product is not organized and is poorly constructed.
The game cannot be played for 15 minutes or more.
Fair
The product is semi organized and has some proof of planning.
The game can be played, but there are 1 or 2 minor issues.
Above Average
The product is mostly organized but not constructed to the best of ability.
There is only one minor issue
Excellent
The product
is organized, has been thoroughly thought through, and is neatly constructed.
No issues, neat, creative, and easily understood to play yet challenging
Terms
Poor
The product has less than 15 terms/tissues covered.
Fair
The product uses at least 20 terms/tissues covered.
Above Average
The product uses at more than 25 tissues/terms covered
Excellent
The product uses all of the tissues/terms covered.
Quality of information
Poor
The information in the game is too easy and does not challenge students on any level.
There are no terms explained appropriately.
Fair
The information in the game is easy with a few challenging topics for students.
Above Average
Most terms are identified by function/structure appropriately. (at least 15) Allows a deeper understanding and review of terms/tissues.
Excellent
All terms/tissues are identified by function/structure appropriately.
Excellent tool to review.
Creativity
Poor
Very plain, little time was put into design. Not too creative.
Students do not want to play this game
Fair
Semi-original, some time put into design but not carried out to best of ability.
Above Average
Good design, somewhat creative. Arrangement has flaws.
Excellent
Original design, creative idea and arrangement. Workable (can be played without issues and rules match the game.) Everyone wants to play this game when they see it.
Presentation/Game rules
Poor
Weak explanation of product. Skipped over many parts. Did not engage audience.
Fair
Fair explination of product. Skipped over some parts.
Above Average
Good explanation of product. Maybe skipped 1 or 2.
Excellent
Excellent explanation of product. All parts were told to class. Explained visual. Showed how to play)
(Explained the pieces, parts, and places of the game clearly)
Seriousness/Conduct
Poor
Laughing, Silly, Had to stop, Lacking seriousness and good conduct. Body language laxed.
Fair
Fair body language. A few problems with some members.
Above Average
Good body/language. One or two problems with one member.
Excellent
Excellent posture/body language by all of group. (Explained appropriately.) Maintained seriousness.
Smoothness/Planning
Poor
No planning went into the project. Members did not get along and worked individually instead of as a team.
Fair
Weak planning as to who will say what and when. Many transition problems. Can't pronounce words.
Above Average
Mostly planned out. One or two transition problems or questions by 1 or 2 members. Fair audience contact.
Excellent
Planned out presentation. All know what to say and when to say. All are knowledgeable. Good audience contact. All can pronounce words.
Visual
Poor
Sloppy, Falling apart. No time put in it.
Several misspelled words or grammar issues
Fair
Not the best in being nice or neat, but not sloppy either.
Above Average
Mostly nice, neat, colorful, typed or written neatly, fair use of resources.
Only 1 misspelled word.
Only 1 grammar issue
Excellent
Nice, neat, colorful, typed or written very professional, good use of resources. Some talent.
No misspelled words and no grammar issues.
Readiness
Poor
Turned in late is not accepted at all.
Fair
Above Average
Project on time. Missing something/someone.
Excellent
On time. Ready to present. All people and parts/extras are here.
Keywords:
tissues, anatomical terminology
Subjects:
Biology
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.