iRubric: Comparative Metadata System Report rubric

- Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the industry/institution, conveyed the significance of the metadata system.

- Overview is clear and concise.

- Demonstrates an understanding of the industry/institution, adequately describes the significance of the metadata system.

- Overview is clear, but disorganized.

- Demonstrates only a partial understanding of the industry/institution, inadequately describes the significance of the metadata system

- Overview is confusing and difficult to follow.

-No evidence of completion and/or concern about material or assignment

- Well organized with coherent structure

- Sophisticated transitional sentences, often develop one idea from the previous one or identify their logical relations. It guides the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.

-Incorporates nomenclature from course readings.

- Shows a logical progression of ideas,
and uses fairly sophisticated transitional devices; e.g., may move, from least to more important idea.

- Some logical links may be faulty,
but each paragraph clearly relates to
paper's central idea.

- No disconcernible structure, but central focus of paper still easily understood.

- Transitions are not in a logical sequence.

- While each paragraph may relate to central idea,
logic is not always clear.

Sloppy, disoriented manner

-Paper follows formatting as instructed,
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

- Citations used appropriately when necessary.

- Citations and bibliography correctly formatted.

-Paper mostly follows formatting as instructed,
Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon, and or conversational/awkwardly tone.

- Citations are used appropriately.

- Citations and bibliography contain a few formatting errors

-Paper does not follow formatting as instructed,

-Paper contains several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

-Language consistently lacks clarity, sentence structure may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.

- Not all citations that are necessary are provided.

- Citations and bibligoraphy contain numerous formatting errors. bibliographical format.

-Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

-Impossible for the reader to follow thinking from sentence to sentence.

- Few, if any, necessary citations are provided.

- Bibliography is missing or incomplete