- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: "Expert" Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
"Expert" Presentation "Expert" Presentation Rubric Code: P2A228 By claudmanning Ready to use Private Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

Expert Project
	Distinguished 20 pts	Proficient 15 pts	Basic 10 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Preparation	Distinguished The quality of work exceeds all expectations. It was evident the presenter was well-prepared!	Proficient The work was done with good effort. It was evident that some time was put into this presentation.	Basic Work was done with fair effort, but the quality was lacking. It was evident that the work was rushed.	Unacceptable Work was done with little effort. It was evident that little time was spent on the final product.
Presentation Content and Delivery	Distinguished The student(s) presented the information clearly and displayed a complete understanding of the information. Applications of the theory were included to illuminate issues; personal examples and 'outside' information was also brought in to enhance the project. Creative and unique use of content.	Proficient The student(s) presented the information fairly clearly and displayed a reasonable understanding of the information. Some general applications of theory were included. An attempt was made to include 'outside' information.	Basic The information presented was general. Little application of the theory was included. No 'outside' information was used.	Unacceptable The presentation was confusing and included unclear content. No 'outside' information was included.
Additional Resources PowerPoint Slides/Handouts/Activities	Distinguished The electronic presentation had an element of creativity (i.e., not just a list of facts). Impressive additional resources were utilized.	Proficient The electronic presentation was logical. The slides were neat and clear. Additional resources were utilized.	Basic The electronic presentation was like a list of facts. The slides lacked neatness and clarity. Additional resources were weak.	Unacceptable The electronic presentation contained many errors and was not creative. Additional resources were not utilized.
Audience Response	Distinguished The presentation captivated the audience. Audience feedback was positive.	Proficient The presentation generally held the attention of the audience. Audience feedback was generally positive.	Basic Little attempt was made to engage the audience. Little interest and feedback from audience.	Unacceptable The presentation lost the interest of the audience. Negative feedback from the audience.
Time Frame	Distinguished The presentation fell within the required time frame, and the pace was appropriate throughout the presentation.	Proficient The presentation was close to the required time frame, and the pace was appropriate most of the time.	Basic The presentation was close to the required time frame, but the pace was inappropriate at times.	Unacceptable The presentation did not meet the time requirements, and the pace was inappropriate.