iRubric: EAST Brochure rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
EAST Brochure EAST Brochure This is a rubric for grading a brochure on a topic of the student's choice. Rubric Code: P25W54 By bakerfamily7 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Assignment Grade Levels: (none)

Category
	1 pts	2 pts	3 pts	4 pts
Organization	1 Layout is confusing; Written communication is limited	2 Layout is haphazard; Written communication is functional but not fully developed	3 Layout is organized; Written communication is effective	4 Layout is logical and appealing; Written communication is focused and interesting
Attractiveness	1 Text fonts and sizes make the brochure difficult to read; distracting and unattractive formatting	2 Text fonts and sizes may cause distraction; unattractive formatting	3 Text fonts and sizes are readable; attractive formatting	4 Text fonts and sizes are well chosen; exceptionally attractive formatting
Content	1 Topic left out Brochure contains very few, if any, details and is not very interesting to read	2 Topic Inferred Brochure contains some of the details from the research and is marginally interesting to read	3 Topic Mentioned: Brochure contains several details from the research and is interesting to read	4 Topic Stated: Brochure contains many details from the research and is exceptionally interesting to read
Spelling/Proofreading	1 More than 4 errors are noted	2 No more than 4 errors are evident after proofreading	3 No more than 2 errors are evident after proofreading	4 No errors are evident after proofreading
Graphics	1 Graphics do not go with the accompanying text or appear to be randomly chosen	2 Graphics go well with the text but there are too few and the brochure seems "text heavy"	3 Graphics go well with the text but there are so many that they distract from the text	4 Graphics go well with the text and there is a good mix of text and appropriate graphics
Peer Evaluation	1 Failed to evaulate student work	2 Briefly looked at student work	3 Show interest in reviewing student work but lacks good suggestions	4 Actively reviewed peer brochures and gave suggestions to better student work