Skip to main content

iRubric: Design Your Own Restaurant Project rubric

home » rubrics » iRubric: Design Your Own Restaurant Project rubric » 
find rubric
Design Your Own Restaurant Project 

Powered by iRubric Restaurant Design Project
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Restaurant Name, Concept, and Theme

Poor

Name was not mentioned or no particular concept or theme was present
Fair

Concept or theme was not developed in detail
Good

Theme was apparent in name and logo but not in design and attributes of the menu
Excellent

Concept and theme was well represented with a creative name, innovative design and specific menu choices were shown
Menu Selection

Poor

Menu options were limited, did not support restaurant's concept or theme, descriptions of menu items were not provided
Fair

Many choices were made available but many did not support the restaurant concept or theme, descriptions were limited or incomplete and lacked sensory details
Good

Menu options were varied and complete, some dishes related to restaurant concept and theme, most dishes were described in sensory detail
Excellent

A variety of menu items were specifically chosen to support the restaurant concept and theme, every dish was described using sensory details
Restaurant Design

Poor

design lacked detail and did not include necessary equipment (kitchen, bathrooms, tables or booths, etc.)
Fair

design were complete and included necessary equipment but lacked detail (furnishings, accessories, labels)
Good

All aspects of design were complete, details were included, attention to audience was evident
Excellent

designs were thorough, complete, colorful, and visually stimulating, attention to audience was evident
Logo

Poor

Logo was not provided or lacked creativity and necessary information
Fair

Logo lacked creativity, some, but not all, essential information was included
Good

Logo was creative and included the use of a slogan or jingle; all essential information was included,
Excellent

Logowas artistic, creative, innovative, and original; Logo was visually stimulating with effective use of jingle or slogan,
Group Collaboration and Effort

Poor

Group members did not collaborate, group members did not equally share responsibilities, deadlines were not met
Fair

Collaboration was evident, responsibilities were shared, but time was not used effectively and some deadlines were not met
Good

Group collaborated well, responsibiltes were shared equally, most deadlines were met
Excellent

Group showed effective use of collaboration and communication, all members contributed, all deadlines were met
Use of Technology

Poor

No technology was used in the restaurant
Fair

Minimal technology was used throughout the restaurant
Good

Technology was used throughout the project and was incorporated into the final product
Excellent

Varied use of technology throughout the project is evident, technology is an integral part of the final product






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n52