Skip to main content

iRubric: CO2 Car rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CO2 Car 
Criteria for CO2 car project
Rubric Code: P24BA6B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric CO2 Car
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Reaserch

Poor

Collected 1 or less than 1 example of dragster cars, listed no websites and took limited notes on car design.
Fair

Collected some examples of dragster cars (2 or more), listed 1 website and took notes on car designs that helped you in your final design and creating.
Good

Collected some (4 or more) examples of dragster cars, listed 1 or 2 websites and took notes on car designs that helped you in your final design and creating.
Excellent

Collected numerous examples (8 or more) of dragster cars, listed some websites (3 or 4) and took notes on car designs that helped you in your final design and creating.
Thumbnails

Poor

Handed in incomplete thumbnail drawings.
Fair

Handed in satisfactory quality thumbnail drawings.
Good

Handed in good quality thumbnail drawings.
Excellent

Handed in very good quality thumbnail drawings.
Sketches

Poor

Handed in poor quality thumbnail sketches. 3 or less drawings in total.
Fair

Handed in satisfactory quality sketches. 3 drawings in total.
Good

Handed in good quality thumbnail sketches. 3 drawings in total.
Excellent

Handed in very good quality sketches, 3 drawings in total.
Final Drawing

Poor

Final drawing is on graph paper and is not 1:1 scale, or not on graph paper. Poor quality.
Fair

Final drawing is on graph paper and is in 1:1 scale, satisfactory quality, neat and clean.
Good

Final drawing is on graph paper and is in 1:1 scale, good quality, neat and clean.
Excellent

Final drawing is on graph paper and is in 1:1 scale, very good quality, neat and clean.
Create, measuring

Poor

Measurements are inaccurate. Ineffective use of criteria given in handout. Car body is an unconvincing replica of final drawing.
Fair

Measurements are partially accurate. Reasonable attempt made to follow criteria in handout. Car body is a plausible replica of final drawing.
Good

Measurements are sufficient. Substantial attempt made to follow criteria in handout. Car body resembles final drawing convincingly.
Excellent

Measurements are precise, and within guidlines in design booklets. Shape of car is exactly like final drawing.
Create, Rough Cutting

Poor

Did not set tool up correctly. Did not follow cut lines. Cuts are made haphazardly. No resemblance to final drawing.
Fair

Set the tool up correctly. Did not follow cut lines. Tools used reasonably to produce a workable car body.
Good

Set the tool up correctly. Followed some of the cut lines. Tools used effectively to produce a practical car body.
Excellent

Set the tool up correctly. Followed all of the cut lines skillfully. Car is an exact replica of final drawing.
Create, Filing, Sanding, Shaping

Poor

Many saw marks left. Corners not rounded. Tools used ineffectively. Extras are glued on.
Fair

A few saw marks left. Some corners not rounded. Tools used reasonably well. Extras such as hood scoops or spoilers glued on.
Good

Most saw marks were removed. Some corners not rounded. Filing, sanding and shaping tools and materials used effectively. Extras such as spoiler or hood scoops cut or carved in.
Excellent

All saw marks were removed. All corners were rounded. Filing, shaping and sanding tools and materials used skillfully. Extras such as spoilers or hood scoops cut or carved in skillfully.
Create, Painting

Poor

Finish was applied poorly. Signs of dripping, bare spots, dull look or incomplete. Only one colour used.
Fair

Some signs of dripping, blank spots or dull paint. Only one colour used.
Good

Paint is effectively applied. No runs, drips or bare spots. Paint is not shiny. More than one colour used but colours do not blend precisely.
Excellent

Paint is skillfully applied. No runs drips or bare spots. Paint is shiny. More than one colour used and colours blend neatly and precisely.
Create, Detailing

Poor

Some detailing in the form of stickers or stencils. Detailing applied haphazardly and ineffectively enhance appearance.
Fair

Hand painted details, added some extra materials, objects or stickers. Details simplistically enhance appearance.
Good

Effectively detailed by hand. Detailing sufficiently enhances appearance.
Excellent

Detailing skillfully applied by hand. Details enhance appearance signifcantly.
Race

Poor

Car raced successfully. Had a time over 2 seconds.
Fair

Car raced successfully. Had a race time of over 1.5 seconds to 2 seconds
Good

Car raced successfully. Had a race time of 1.5 seconds to 1 second
Excellent

Car raced successfully. Had a race time of under 1 second.
Evaluation

Poor

Completed a brief written evaluation, answered some of the questions on the booklet provided. Brief or no mention of modifications or intended improvements on design for future remake.
Fair

Completed a simple written evaluation, answered most of the questions on the booklet provided. Briefly mentioned modifications and intended improvements on design for future remake.
Good

Completed a detailed written evaluation, answered most of the questions on the booklet provided. Briefly mentioned modifications and intended improvements on design for future remake.
Excellent

Completed a detailed written evaluation, answered all the questions on the booklet provided. Mentioned modifications and intended improvements on design for future remake.
Design Cycle

Poor

Did not followed the design cycle in the correct order and participated was very poor.
Fair

Followed the design cycle in the correct order some of the time and participated in some classes.
Good

Followed the design cycle in the correct order most of the time and participated in most classes.
Excellent

Followed the design cycle in the correct order and participated in every class.
Clean Up - scored each class

Poor

Did not clean up after class activities consistently. perhaps
Fair

Cleaned up some of the time after each class.
Good

Cleaned up mess most of the time after each class.
Excellent

Consistently cleaned up mess after every class.
Effort and attitude

Poor

Made very little to no effort throughout the project. Satisfactory attitude.
Fair

Made an effort in some of the class activities and classwork. Good attitude.
Good

Consistently made an effort is most of the class activities and classwork. Very good attitude.
Excellent

Consistently made an effort in all activities and classwork. Excellent attitude.
Timely completion

Poor

Handed in work 3 days late - 3
Fair

Handed in work 2 days late - 2
Good

Handed in all work a day late - 1
Excellent

Handed work in on time.



Keywords:
  • CO2 Car


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n7