Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Teacher Interview rubric

iRubric: Teacher Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Teacher Interview Teacher Interview Interview for teacher candidates Rubric Code: P248X8X By mgilliland65 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Teacher Interview
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Notes 0 pts
Degree Degree in Education	Poor Candidate has a degree from a secular or Christian university, but is not willing to pursue coursework or degree in education.	Fair Candidate has a degree from a secular or Christian university, but not in education. He/She is willing to pursue a coursework or degree in education.	Good Candidate has a degree in education from a secular university. Or, for MS/HS, they possess a degree in the content area they will be teaching and have experience teaching.	Excellent Candidate has a degree in education (bachelor's or higher) from a Christian university. MS/HS candidate has a concentration in the subject content he/she will be teaching.	Notes
Biblical Worldview Christian Experience/Biblical Worldview	Poor Candidate may or may not confess a relationship with Christ. He/she did not exhibit indicators that he/she possesses an understanding of biblical worldview or worldview drastically differs from biblical worldview.	Fair Candidate confesses a relationship with Christ; however, Biblical worldview may be formed by conflicting worldview of our program. May periodically attend church, but not actively developing biblical worldview.	Good Candidate possess relationship with Christ, but may not be significantly mature in their faith and biblical worldview. Limited church attendance/involvement, Bible study, etc., that would develop their biblical worldview.	Excellent Candidate possesses a mature relationship with Christ and understands importances of biblical worldview. Involved in church, Bible study, etc., to actively develop his/her biblical worldview.	Notes
Curriculum Knowledge and experience with Christian curriculum	Poor Candidate has no knowledge and experience with Christian curriculum, such as BJU, Abeka, Purposeful Design, etc.	Fair Candidate has little knowledge and experience with Christian curriculum, such as BJU, Abeka, Purposeful Design, etc.	Good Candidate has adequate knowledge and experience with Christian curriculum, such as BJU, Abeka, Purposeful Design, etc.	Excellent Candidate has extensive knowledge and experience with Christian curriculum, such as BJU, Abeka, Purposeful Design, etc.	Notes
Classroom Management Level of experience implementing classroom management skills	Poor Candidate has very little classroom management experience or plan	Fair Candidate has some classroom management experience from student teaching	Good Candidate has an understanding of the skills needed to effectively manage a classroom	Excellent Candidate has the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively manage a classrroom	Notes
Teaching Reflection/Experience Level of response when asked to reflect on teaching experiences	Poor Candidate shows minimal ability to reflect on relevant experiences	Fair Candidate can reflect on small number of relevant experiences	Good Candidate can reflect on a variety of relevant experiences	Excellent Candidate can reflect on a wide variety of relevant experiences	Notes
Ability to self-reflect in responses Can identify strengths and weaknesses, approach to conflict, and other areas when asked to self-reflect.	Poor Presentation of self-reflection not comprehensive and lacks conviction or focus	Fair Presents some self-reflection in a matter of fact way, but not in a meaningful or connected manner	Good Presents self-reflection, but not with complete confidence in his/her responses	Excellent Presents self-reflection with clarity, relevance, confidence and enthusiasm	Notes
Parent Relationships/Communication Level of understanding of appropriate parent-teacher-school relationship and how to effectively communicate.	Poor Lack of understanding of the student-parent-teacher-school relationship and how to partner with parents	Fair Demonstrates minimal depth of understanding of the student-parent-teacher-school relationship and how to partner with parents and little or no experience doing so	Good Demonstrates adequate depth of understanding of the student-parent-teacher-school relationship and how to partner with parents and some experience doing so	Excellent Demonstrates a full and comprehensive understanding of the role of parents in the student-parent-teacher-school relationship and how to partner with them for the benefit of the student. Significant experience doing so	Notes
PD goals Goals for professional development	Poor Candidate demonstrated no long-term plans or goals in professional development	Fair Candidate has some ideas of future goals in professional development, but did not specifically express what the goals are	Good Candidate has direction of goals in professional development and a plan to achieve desired goals	Excellent Candidate has detailed plans and is in process in achieving desired goals in professional development	Notes
Ability to contribute to school Any skills/interests that could support other areas of our program?	Poor Has minimal skills to contribute	Fair Has some relevant skills and can contribute	Good Has a range of skills and ability to contribute	Excellent Has a wide range of relevant skills and demonstrates ability to contribute	Notes
Professional Dress/Demeanor Interview "presence" through attire and attitude during interview.	Poor Demeanor and dress is not professional	Fair Candidate's demeanor and dress possessed minimal degree of professional presentation. t	Good Candidate's demeanor and dress possessed a reasonable degree of professional presentation	Excellent Candidate's demeanor and dress possessed a high degree of professional presentation	Notes

Keywords:

Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Vocational rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n232