Skip to main content
iRubric: Genetic Engineering Debates rubric

iRubric: Genetic Engineering Debates rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Genetic Engineering Debates 
Should Pluto be considered a planet, again?
tbd
Rubric Code: NXC7X67
By hilda274
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Genetic Engineering Debate
  GOAT

5 pts

FIRE

4 pts

GOOD

3 pts

MEH

2 pts

OOF

1 pts

Respect for Other Team

A
GOAT

All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
FIRE

Most statements, body language, and responses were respectful and appropriate. Rarely interrupted or talked over other team members.
GOOD

Most statements, body language and responses were respectful and appropriate. Interrupted or talked over other team members a few times.
MEH

Statements, body language and responses were borderline disrespectful, with sarcasm apparent. Frequently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
OOF

Statements, body language and responses were consistently not respectful or downright rude. Constantly interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Oganization

B
GOAT

All arguments were clearly tied to a single idea and organized in tight, logical fashion.
FIRE

Most arguments were clearly tied to a single idea and organized in tight, logical fashion.
GOOD

Most arguments were clearly tied to a single idea and organized in a somewhat logical fashion.
MEH

Most arguments were loosely tied to an idea and somewhat disorganized.
OOF

All arguments were loosely tied to many ideas and very disorganized.
Understanding of Topic

C
GOAT

The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information strongly and convincingly.
FIRE

The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
GOOD

The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
MEH

The team seemed to basically understand the topic but did not present the information with ease.
OOF

The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Opening Statement

1
GOAT

Opening statement very clearly defines the viewpoint of the team, discusses major point and history in a clever and interesting way.
FIRE

Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team, discusses major point and history in a somewhat interesting way.
GOOD

Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team, discusses major point and history.
MEH

Opening statement roughly defines the viewpoint of the team, but does not discuss major point and/or history.
OOF

Opening statement does not clearly define the viewpoint, and does not discuss major point and/or history.
Use of Facts/Statistics

2
GOAT

Every major point is well supported with relevant facts, statistics, or examples. Points are expressed in a highly persuasive manner.
FIRE

Most major points are well supported with relevant facts, statistics, or examples. Points are expressed in a persuasive manner.
GOOD

Most major points are supported with facts, statistics, or examples. Points are expressed in a somewhat persuasive manner.
MEH

Few major points are supported with facts or statistics. Points are not expressed in a persuasive manner.
OOF

Major points are not supported with facts or statistics. Points are not expressed in a persuasive manner.
Rebuttal

3
GOAT

All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
Clearly able to accurately defend position.
FIRE

Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Able to defend position.
GOOD

Most counter arguments were accurate and relevant; some were strong. Somewhat able to defend position.
MEH

Some counter arguments were accurate and relevant. Somewhat able to defend position.
OOF

Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Unable to defend position.
Concluding Statement

4
GOAT

Concluding statement very clearly summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons/evidence, and IMPACT (from "choose 3") in a clever and interesting way.
FIRE

Concluding statement clearly summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons/evidence, and IMPACT (from "choose 3") in a somewhat interesting way.
GOOD

Concluding statement summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons or evidence, and IMPACT (from "choose 3").
MEH

Concluding statement roughly summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons or evidence or IMPACT (from "choose 3").
OOF

Concluding statement does not summarize the viewpoint of the team, and does not review reasons or evidence or IMPACT (from "choose 3").






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232