Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Genetic Engineering Debates rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Genetic Engineering Debates
Should Pluto be considered a planet, again?
tbd
Rubric Code:
NXC7X67
By
hilda274
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Genetic Engineering Debate
GOAT
5 pts
FIRE
4 pts
GOOD
3 pts
MEH
2 pts
OOF
1 pts
Respect for Other Team
A
GOAT
All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
FIRE
Most statements, body language, and responses were respectful and appropriate. Rarely interrupted or talked over other team members.
GOOD
Most statements, body language and responses were respectful and appropriate. Interrupted or talked over other team members a few times.
MEH
Statements, body language and responses were borderline disrespectful, with sarcasm apparent. Frequently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
OOF
Statements, body language and responses were consistently not respectful or downright rude. Constantly interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Oganization
B
GOAT
All arguments were clearly tied to a single idea and organized in tight, logical fashion.
FIRE
Most arguments were clearly tied to a single idea and organized in tight, logical fashion.
GOOD
Most arguments were clearly tied to a single idea and organized in a somewhat logical fashion.
MEH
Most arguments were loosely tied to an idea and somewhat disorganized.
OOF
All arguments were loosely tied to many ideas and very disorganized.
Understanding of Topic
C
GOAT
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information strongly and convincingly.
FIRE
The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
GOOD
The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
MEH
The team seemed to basically understand the topic but did not present the information with ease.
OOF
The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Opening Statement
1
GOAT
Opening statement very clearly defines the viewpoint of the team, discusses major point and history in a clever and interesting way.
FIRE
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team, discusses major point and history in a somewhat interesting way.
GOOD
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team, discusses major point and history.
MEH
Opening statement roughly defines the viewpoint of the team, but does not discuss major point and/or history.
OOF
Opening statement does not clearly define the viewpoint, and does not discuss major point and/or history.
Use of Facts/Statistics
2
GOAT
Every major point is well supported with relevant facts, statistics, or examples. Points are expressed in a highly persuasive manner.
FIRE
Most major points are well supported with relevant facts, statistics, or examples. Points are expressed in a persuasive manner.
GOOD
Most major points are supported with facts, statistics, or examples. Points are expressed in a somewhat persuasive manner.
MEH
Few major points are supported with facts or statistics. Points are not expressed in a persuasive manner.
OOF
Major points are not supported with facts or statistics. Points are not expressed in a persuasive manner.
Rebuttal
3
GOAT
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
Clearly able to accurately defend position.
FIRE
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Able to defend position.
GOOD
Most counter arguments were accurate and relevant; some were strong. Somewhat able to defend position.
MEH
Some counter arguments were accurate and relevant. Somewhat able to defend position.
OOF
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Unable to defend position.
Concluding Statement
4
GOAT
Concluding statement very clearly summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons/evidence, and IMPACT (from "choose 3") in a clever and interesting way.
FIRE
Concluding statement clearly summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons/evidence, and IMPACT (from "choose 3") in a somewhat interesting way.
GOOD
Concluding statement summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons or evidence, and IMPACT (from "choose 3").
MEH
Concluding statement roughly summarizes the viewpoint of the team, reviews reasons or evidence or IMPACT (from "choose 3").
OOF
Concluding statement does not summarize the viewpoint of the team, and does not review reasons or evidence or IMPACT (from "choose 3").
Subjects:
English
Science
Education
Types:
Presentation
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.