iRubric: Critical Book Review rubric

- Demonstrates sophistication of thought.
- Communicates clearly and follows a logical sequence.
- Understands and critically evaluates
the work in terms of relation to this current study of disability ministry, present culture, and connection to personal experience.
-Addresses required points of agreement and disagreement.
-Provides and alternative point of view which is supported by details such as other works, personal experience or interviews with people affec

- Presents sound points and argument.
- May stray at times from analysis to description.<BR>
- Communicates clearly and follows a logical sequence, with some minor lapses.<BR>
- Understands the work, but does not critically evaluate all aspects of it.
-Addresses some points of agreement and disagreement.
-Provides an alternative point of view but provides only some support for the idea.

- Poorly-stated, vague arguments.
- Uses general terms and does not always follow a logical sequence.
- Describes but does not critically evaluate the work.
-Addresses one of the points of agreement or disagreement.
-Provides an alternative point of view with no support.

- Absence of any clear arguments
-Does not address points of agreement or disagreement
-Does not provide an alternative point of view.

-Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
- Citations used appropriately when necessary.
- Citations and bibliography correctly formatted.

-Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
- Citations are used appropriately.
- Citations and bibliography contain a few formatting errors

-Paper contains several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language consistently lacks clarity, sentence structure may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.
- Not all citations that are necessary are provided.
- Citations and bibligoraphy contain numerous formatting errors. bibliographical format.

-Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
-Impossible for the reader to follow thinking from sentence to sentence.<BR>
- Few, if any, necessary citations are provided.<BR>
- Bibliography is missing or incomplete