iRubric: Logo Design for an Organization rubric

Professional (very neat and careful attention to details). There is strong unity and consistency among text and graphic elements. Text and graphic elements are arranged to create an organized "white space". Choice of text and graphics strongly fit the subject / mood of the work.

Somewhat professional (neat and some attention to details). There is adequate unity but some inconsistency among text and graphic elements. Text and graphic elements are arranged but lack structured and appropriate "white space" appearing cluttered. Choice of text and graphics somewhat fit the subject/mood of the work.

Barely professional (lack of attention to details). Project has text and graphics however there is little unity and consistency among text and graphic elements. Text and graphics lack or have too much "white space". Choice of text and graphics slightly fit the subject / mood of the work.

Unprofessional (very sloppy). There is no unity or consistency among text and graphic elements.
Project lacks text or graphics with no organized "white space". Choice of text and graphics do not fit the subject/mood of the work.

Project shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are very creative & inventive.

Project shows some original thought. Ideas are somewhat creative & inventive.

Project shows little original thought. Ideas are barely creative & inventive.

Project is based on someone else's ideas.

The student speaks very
clearly without hesitation.
Pronunciation and
intonation sound natural.

The student speaks with some hesitation. Problems with pronunciation and
intonation do not prevent communication.

The student hesitates
frequently. Problems with
pronunciation and
intonation distort meaning
and inhibit communication
in some instances.

Frequent hesitations and
extreme problems with
pronunciation cause
communication to break
down.

The team worked well
together to achieve
objectives. Each member
contributed in a valuable
way to the project. All data
sources indicated a high
level of mutual respect and
collaboration

The team worked well together
most of the time, with only a few
occurrences of communication
breakdown or failure to
collaborate when appropriate.
Members were mostly respectful
of each other.

Team did not collaborate
or communicate well.
Some members would
work independently,
without regard to
objectives or priorities. A
lack of respect and regard
was frequently noted

Some members in the team did't contribute in the work.

Points: 17-20
performance well exceed expectations.
(exceptionally done)

Points: 13-16
performance is above specified expectations.
(well done)

Points: 9-12
Performance is less than specified expectations.
(fairly done)

Points: 6-9
Performance is lower than specified expectations.
(poorly done)