Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Scoring Criteria- Editorials rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Scoring Criteria- Editorials
Scoring Criteria- Editorials
Rubric Code:
NX669W8
By
Facilitator
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Editorial
Above Standards
3 pts
Meets Standards
2 pts
Below Standards
1 pts
Establish the Problem
Above Standards
The writer presents a clear reason for writing the editoral.
Meets Standards
This writer presents a reason for writing the editoral but does not make it perfectly clear.
Below Standards
The writer does not present a reason for writing the editorial.
Take a Stance
Above Standards
This editorial has a clearly stated opinion in the article. The editiorial discredits the opposition.
Meets Standards
This editorial has an opinion that could be stated more clearly using better wording. The editorial attempts to discredit the opposition, but lacks evidence.
Below Standards
This editorial has an opinion which is somewhat confusing or does not show whether they are for or against the issue. The editorial does not discredit the opposition.
Show of Evidence
Party Platforms
Above Standards
Each reason is written in a separate paragraph with a topic sentence and is supported with sufficient evidence.
Meets Standards
Each reason is written in separate paragraphs, but not necessarily with a topic sentence. Reasons lack sufficient evidence to support opinion.
Below Standards
No topic sentences and no evidence is presented.
Call to Action
Above Standards
The writer ends the article giving a specific recommendation for the reader to take action and the reasons for the recommendation.
Meets Standards
The writer ends the article giving a recommendation for the reader to take action with only one reason for the recommendation.
Below Standards
The writer ends the article giving a recommendation for the reader to take action without a reason for the recommendation.
Conventions
Above Standards
Author follows rules of grammar, so the essay is exceptionally easy to read.
Meets Standards
Author makes 3-4 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content and interrupt the flow of the essay.
Below Standards
Author makes 3-4 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content and interrupt the flow of the essay.
Keywords:
Editorial Writing
Subjects:
Humanities
Journalism
Education
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.