Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Book Report Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Book Report Rubric
Copy of Book Report Rubric 5th & 6t
Newspaper Book Report
Rubric Code:
NX2968
By
mhubbard2007
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Reading
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Choice book report activity
Poor
(N/A)
Acceptable
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Well Done
(N/A)
Outstanding Work
(N/A)
Organization
Poor
Significant information is missing, or not recorded properly. No headlines used in text.
Acceptable
Most important information is presented in a logical sequence and recorded properly. Not every article has a clear headline
Good
Necessary information was covered, but not presented logically or recorded properly. Article placement somewhat haphazard with not concern for placement or organization. Majority of articles have basic headline.
Well Done
Necessary information was covered logically and recorded properly. Articles show proper organization. Each article has a clear title for each section.
Outstanding Work
All necessary information was presented logically and recorded properly. Not only does each article have a title, but titles show flare and clear headings. Newspaper articles well organized
Creativity
Poor
Student took no creative license or initiative to personalize project to suit text or self.
Acceptable
Student took little creative license or initiative to personalize project to suit text or self
Good
Evidence of some creative license or initiative to personalize project to suit text or self
Well Done
Signficant evidence of creative license or initiative to personalize project to suit text or self
Outstanding Work
Project is truly original and characterizes creativity and personalization of the project to the text or self
Grammar/ Sentence Structure, format
Poor
Numerous errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, word usage, run-on sentences, sentence fragments or structure. No evidence of proof-reading.
Acceptable
Some errors occurred in in capitalization, punctuation, word usage, run-on sentences, sentence fragments or structure Proof-reading questionable.
Good
A few errors occurred in capitalization, punctuation, word usage, sentence structure and structure Proof-reading inadequate.
Well Done
A couple errors occurred in capitalization, punctuation, word usage, sentence structure and structure Proof-reading evident.
Outstanding Work
There were no errors or evidence of corrections in the report. Words were well chosen and sentences were concise. Paper can be fluently read without stopping because of grammar errors.
Plot / Summary
Poor
Information covered does not describe the plot, conflict or resolution.
Acceptable
The plot was not clearly stated or the conflict/resolution was not clearly stated. Summary is at times confusing because of gaps in summary.
Good
Plot or conflict/resolution is briefly, but clearly stated. Summary is very concise with little elaboaration.
Well Done
Plot or conflict/resolution is clearly and adequately developed. Most aspects of Who, What, Where, When and Why were elaboarated on.
Outstanding Work
The plot or conflict/resolution was clearly stated and summarized. Sentences are well developed and presented in an interesting manner. All aspects of story: Who, What, Where, When and Why are clearly developed and analyzed.
Main Character Article
Poor
Student did not share any clear information about the main character.
Acceptable
Student gave very basic details about the character with little elaboration on traits of the character.
Good
Student's description of character very one dimentional, with vague descriptions with moderate elaboration.
Well Done
Description of character more detailed but leaves gaps in the overall description of the character.
Outstanding Work
Student give a thorough description of the character and goes above and beyond just the basic facts.
Neatness/Artwork
Poor
Work was very difficult to read, paper was torn or crumpled, work was smugged--artwork appears "last minute".
Acceptable
Paper was ripped, smugged or wrinkled. Some words or sentences were difficult to read, artwork appears to have minimal effort given.
Good
Paper was neatly written and presented, artwork appears to have some effort.
Well Done
Paper was neatly written or typed. Little evidence of corrections having been made. Effort is evident in the artwork.
Outstanding Work
Paper was neatly written or typed with no evidence of corrections having been made. Artwork shows outstanding effort. Creative development of the newspaper format. Artwork is neat and appropriate to the work.
Features
Poor
Two or less features are completed.
Acceptable
Three out of the four features are covered in the paper, details are not clear or nealy done.
Good
Four features basically covered, meeting most of the requirements stipulated for each section.
Well Done
Four features are covered with the main detail required for each section.
Outstanding Work
All four features cover the required components and go beyond expectations with proper elaboration and organization.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Reading
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.