iRubric: Math Game Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Math Game Project Math Game Project Students will be divided into groups of two or three. They will then create a math game with higher math concepts. The game can be an adaptation of an existing game or a sport. This assignment will be handed in during the week of April 13-16. During this week students will give an oral presentation and on Friday April 17 this game will be exposed to the school for playing. The game must have directions and be able to last 15 minutes. Neatness and quality are vital. Age level of game a must. Rubric Code: NX243C8 By Denean Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Enter rubric title
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts
Mathematical Concepts	Poor The math concepts are of higher level thinking and there are errors in the game.	Fair The math concepts are of higher level thinking and there are few errors in the game.	Good The math concepts are of higher level thinking and there are no errors in the game.
Written Directions	Poor Somewhat clear, but have many errors that cause the players questions or have to speculate on what to do in the game.	Fair Clear rules on how to play the game but has some errors.	Good The rules are well written and clear. There are no questions on how to procede with the game.
Quality and Neatness	Poor The game lacked the quality and neatness. It need more time and effort in order to make it appear of high quality.	Fair Creative and well done. The game might have been ready for publishing if it just had a little bit more quality in the overall appearance.	Good Take this to the publisher! The time you put in was definately a benefit to the neatness and quality of your game!
Employability	Poor The game lacked the spark to maintain interest but had effort at engagement.	Fair The game engaged the players for a while but could have had more challenge to it.	Good The game was engaging and full of challenge. The players did not have time to lose interest.
Cooperation	Poor Contributed little to group project, and did not work well with members of the group.	Fair Contributed to the group to a lesser extent than other members, and/or did not work well with other group members.	Good Contributed several ideas and worked well with other group members. Completed an equal share of the project work.