Skip to main content
iRubric: 30-Minute Stylistic Analysis Essay rubric

iRubric: 30-Minute Stylistic Analysis Essay rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
30-Minute Stylistic Analysis Essay 
Rubric for a 30 minute AP Art History Style Stylistic Comparison Essay
Rubric Code: N7A67
By MelanieP
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Formal Analysis Short Essay
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Summary

Poor

Student uses some of the formal and and technical descriptions to summarize the overall analysis of the work based on inital observation of the work.
Fair

Student used the formal and and technical descriptions to summarize the overall analysis of the work based on inital observation of the work.
Good

Student used the formal and and technical descriptions to make an informed summary the overall analysis of the work based on inital observation of the work.
Materials

Poor

Student generalizes the composition and then move on to a describes the materials used.(acrylic, watercolor, plaster)
Fair

Student describes the composition and then move on to a description of the materials used (acrylic, watercolor, plaster)
Good

Student describes the composition and then move on to a description of the materials used and the porposes of the material selection(acrylic, watercolor, plaster)
Description

Poor

Describe some of things in the order in which they draw your eye around the object, starting with the first thing you notice and moving to the next.
Fair

Describe things in the order in which they draw your eye around the object, starting with the first thing you notice and moving to the next.
Good

Describe in detail things in the order in which they draw your eye around the object, starting with the first thing you notice and moving to the next. Student also uses correct formal terminolgy in the description.
Interpretation

Poor

Student describes some of the how two works with the same type of content look totally different from each other, because of the style (for example, both paintings are still lifes, but show different approaches to three-dimensionality, etc.)
Fair

Student describes the links in the formal descriptions to makes informed interpertation based observations in the work.
Good

Student describes in detail the links in the formal descriptions to makes informed interpertation based on factual observations in the work.
Historical Evidence

Poor

Student uses details from the work and makes some connections between the style of the work and the historical factors and forces in culture that lead to that style.
Fair

Student uses details from the work and discusses the meaning of those details to support the connections between the style of the work and the historical factors and forces in culture that lead to that style..
Good

Student uses details from the work and researches the meaning of those details to support the connections between the style of the work and the historical factors that lead to that style.
Comparison Category

Poor

Students identifies the style of the work used and explins why it does and does not fit into the stylitic category of a Non-Western work of Architecture.
Fair

Students describes the stylitic category of the works used and explins why it does and does not fit into the stylitic category using some references to the works choosen.
Good

Students describes in detail the stylitic category of the works used and explins why it does and does not fit into the stylitic category using specific references tot he works choosen.



Keywords:
  • AP Art History


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232