Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Oral Presentations (With Visual Aid) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Oral Presentations (With Visual Aid)
Oral Presentations (With Visual Aid)
Areas of Interaction Fair
Rubric Code:
N75635
By
gabysaa
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Oral Presnetation
Good (5)
5 pts
Average (4)
4 pts
Fair (3)
3 pts
Under Average (2)
2 pts
Poor (1)
1 pts
Oral Skills
Eye Contact
Good (5)
Made eye contact at least 5 times.
Average (4)
Made eye contact at least 4 times.
Fair (3)
Made eye contact at least 3 times.
Under Average (2)
Made eye contact at least 2 times.
Poor (1)
Made eye contact 1 time OR made eye contact 0 times.
Posture
Good (5)
Was upright all the time.
Average (4)
Was upright most of the time.
Fair (3)
Was upright some of the time.
Under Average (2)
Was upright a few of the time.
Poor (1)
Was upright for very little of no time.
Hand Usage
Good (5)
Hands were constantly used and were pointing to the visual aid and to show expression.
Average (4)
Hands were mostly used and were pointing to the visual aid and to show expression. Hands went into pocket once.
Fair (3)
Hands were sometimes used and were pointing to the visual aid and to show expression. Hands went into pocket twice or thrice.
Under Average (2)
Hands were rarely used and were pointing to the visual aid and to show expression. Hands were in pocket for a lot of time.
Poor (1)
Hands were never or once used and were pointing at visual aid and to show expression. Hands were always in pocket or came out once or twice.
Body Language
Good (5)
Body language constantly portrayed enthusiasm and interest.
Average (4)
Body language mostly portrayed enthusiasm and interest.
Fair (3)
Body language sometimes portrayed enthusiasm and interest.
Under Average (2)
Body language rarely portrayed enthusiasm and interest.
Poor (1)
Body language never or once portrayed enthusiasm and interest.
Class play
Volume
Good (5)
The volume was constantly loud enough to be heard and soft enough to not be overpowering.
Average (4)
The volume was mostly loud enough to be heard and soft enough to not be overpowering.
Fair (3)
The volume was sometimes loud enough to be heard and soft enough to not be overpowering.
Under Average (2)
The volume was rarely loud enough to be heard and soft enough to not be overpowering.
Poor (1)
The volume was almost never or never loud enough to be heard and soft enough to not be overpowering.
Expression
Good (5)
The expression always helped keep interest of audience.
Average (4)
The expression greatly helped keep interest of audience.
Fair (3)
The expression somewhat helped keep interest of audience.
Under Average (2)
The expression rarely helped keep interest of audience.
Poor (1)
The expression did not or once helped keep interest of audience.
Focus
Good (5)
The focus was always on the topic and never deviated.
Average (4)
The focus was mostly on the topic and deviated once.
Fair (3)
The focus was mainly on the topic and deviated twice.
Under Average (2)
The focus was rarely on the topic and deviated thrice.
Poor (1)
The focus was never or few times on the topic and deviated constantly.
Visual Aids
Creativity
Good (5)
The visual aid was creative in showing the necessary information.
Average (4)
The visual aid was mostly creative in showing the necessary information.
Fair (3)
The visual aid was somewhat creative in showing the necessary information.
Under Average (2)
The visual aid was mediocre, creatively, in showing the necessary information.
Poor (1)
The visual aid was not or barely creative in showing the necessary information.
Neatness
Good (5)
The visual aid was neat and organized and followed a logical flow.
Average (4)
The visual aid was mostly neat and organized and followed a logical flow.
Fair (3)
The visual aid was sometimes neat and organized and followed a logical flow.
Under Average (2)
The visual aid was rarely neat and organized and followed a logical flow.
Poor (1)
The visual aid was not or barely neat and organized and followed a logical flow.
Content
Information
Good (5)
All the information is given. The power point showed all the information asked in the instructions.
Average (4)
Most of the information is given. The power point showed most of the information asked in the instructions.
Fair (3)
Some of the information is given. The power point showed some of the information asked in the instructions.
Under Average (2)
A small amount of the information is given. The power point showed almost none of the information asked in the instructions.
Poor (1)
None or very little of the information is given. The power point showed none of the information asked in the instructions.
Connection
Good (5)
There is an accurate and clear connection between the topic and the area of interaction community and service
Average (4)
The connection is mostly accurate and clear.
Fair (3)
The connection is somehow accurate and clear.
Under Average (2)
The connection is barely accurate and clear.
Poor (1)
The connection is inaccurate and unclear.
Keywords:
AIO FAIR
Subjects:
English
Humanities
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.