iRubric: Annotated Bibliography?literary Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Annotated Bibliography?literary Review Annotated Bibliography Holistic criteria for basic components of a research-level annotated bibliography or a focused literary review. Rubric Code: N6WA59 By euge620 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Annotated Bibliography Paper
	Excellent 4 pts	Developing strongly 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Not acceptable 1 pts
Overall Format	Excellent Followed directions/formatting with few to no errors	Developing strongly Attempted to follow directions/formatting with some errors	Good Some attempt to follow directions/formatting noted with major errors	Not acceptable Work sloppy, directions/formatting not followed.
Topic Complexity	Excellent Topic has been thought out and developed	Developing strongly Good topic with good possibility of development	Good Simple topic with beginning level of depth	Not acceptable Simple topic without depth
Introduction and Thesis Statement	Excellent Good development of detail and use of in-depth analysis	Developing strongly Good development of detail with some degree of in-depth analysis	Good Has some detail but lacks needs in-depth analysis	Not acceptable Lacks detail and in-depth analysis
Citation Format	Excellent Format followed, few errors	Developing strongly Format attempted (or incorrect format) but consistent	Good Format attempted (or incorrect format), not consistent	Not acceptable Format not followed
Citation Summaries
	Excellent Summary has good analysis and depth, shows good understanding of material 5 pts	Average Summary has sufficient analysis and depth, shows some understanding of material 4 pts	Needs Improvement Summary has some analysis, but lacks depth, shows some understanding of material 3 pts	Poor Summary lacks analysis or depth, shows no understanding of material 2 pts
Reference 1	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 2	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 3	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 4	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 5	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Citation Relevance
	Excellent Has good analysis and depth, shows good understanding of material as it relates to topic with good analysis and depth 5 pts	Average Shows good understanding of material and how it relates to topic with sufficient analysis and depth 4 pts	Needs Improvement Shows some understanding of material relates to topic with some analysis and depth 3 pts	Poor Shows no understanding of how material relates to topic with no analysis or depth 2 pts
Reference 1	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 2	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 3	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 4	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor
Reference 5	Excellent	Average	Needs Improvement	Poor

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric