Skip to main content

iRubric: JClic Project 2012 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
JClic Project 2012 JClic Project Rubric Code: N6BA5A By roguigar Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

JClic Project
	Disregarded 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Activities 70 %
Information page	Disregarded The student did not complete the information page of the project	Poor Most information is lacking	Fair Most information is complete although some issues have been ignored	Good The student fully completed the information page of the project
Coherence	Disregarded There is not a coherent unit since most activities deal with different learning topics.	Poor The vocabulary employed in the project belongs to two different topics.	Fair Most activities belong to a coherent learning uni: the majority of words employed are the same or related to the same topic throughout the activities	Good The activities create a coherent learning unit: words are the same or related to the same topic throughout the activities.
Number and Type of Activities	Disregarded The project has less than 5 activities. Most activities are of the same type	Poor The project has at least 6 activities. There are less than 6 different types of activities	Fair You have the minimum (10) number of activities. There are activities of most types	Good The projects contains more than the minimun number of activities asked for. There is at least one activity of each type
Instructions	Disregarded Instructions are not clear in most activities. There are many spelling and grammar mistakes on them.	Poor Clear and brief instructions in at least half the activities. Numerous spelling and grammar mistakes.	Fair Clear, brief and mostly mistake free instructions in most activities either in English orSpanish	Good Clear, brief, mistake free instructions for all activities in both English and Spanish
Logical sequence Presentation / Practice	Disregarded No attention to the sequencing of most activities	Poor	Fair Most activities follow a logical sequence although their organization could be improved	Good There is an appropriate organization and sequence of activities that follows pedagogical criteria
Linguistic usefulness	Disregarded Most activities lack linguistic usefulness	Poor There are more than 2 activities lacking linguistic usefulness	Fair There is one activity linguistically useless.	Good All activities are linguistically useful
Images	Disregarded	Poor Most are not appropriate or present problems	Fair Some are not appropriate or present problems	Good Very appropriate choice of images
Aesthetics Interface colors, organization	Disregarded Most elements and backgrounds are gray. The size of images , pannels and fonts is too small for students. Poor contrast between text and background on most activities	Poor Most activities (7 or -) aren't colourful or aesthetically nice. There are plenty of gray elements	Fair Most activities (+7) are colourful and aesthetically nice, although there may be ocassionally a forgotten background element in gray. On occasion, the contrast between background and text isn't good	Good All activities are colourful and aesthetically nice. No gray color at all. (Messages, window, inactive state) Size is adequate. Background and text have good contrast
Creativity and Effort	Disregarded Overall impression of work is very poor.	Poor Overall impression of work is poor.	Fair Overall impression of work is average.	Good Overall impression of work is impressive.
Credits	Disregarded No credit for images or sounds is given in the project	Poor Generic pages like www.google.com are in the credits	Fair	Good Credit for images and sounds is given in the project
Language 30 %
Preparation	Disregarded The topic is not identified or is unrelated to the task. Explanations are limited or absent. Required information is not covered. After the presentation, the student is unable to defend the topic accurately.	Poor Student struggles to provide clear explanations. Some of the required information is left out. After the presentation, the student struggles to defend the topic accurately	Fair Student provides some explanations. Most of the required information is covered. After the presentation, the student is able to defend the topic by answering questions accurately.	Good Student provides deep explanations. All required information is covered. After the presentation, the student successfully defends the topic by answering questions with thought and precision.
Spelling	Disregarded Spelling or grammar mistakes are frequent in the work. It is evident that students have not taken care of reviewing their project	Poor	Fair Although there are slight mistakes in the instructions, they are fully understandable. No mistakes in the specific vocabulary for the students.	Good No spelling or grammar mistakes are evident in the work. It is evident that students have taken care of reviewing their project

Subjects:

English

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202