Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Sophocles In-Class Essay rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Sophocles In-Class Essay
In-Class Essay
in-class essay
Rubric Code:
N6788X
By
mfriedman
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Sophocles in-class essay
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Content
40 %
Poor
Essay does not clearly explain who the tragic hero of ANTIGONE is
Fair
-Essay explains who the tragic hero of ANTIGONE is, but does not use Oedipus as a model.
-Essay uses at least three examples.
Good
-Essay clearly explains who the tragic hero of ANTIGONE is by using Oedipus as a model.
-Essay uses at least three examples.
Excellent
-Essay effectively explains who the tragic hero of ANTIGONE is using Oedipus as a model and showing a deep understanding of the tragic hero's path.
-Effectively uses at least three examples from ANTIGONE and examples from OEDIPUS REX, too.
Structure
40 %
Poor
-Lacks a clear organizational structure.
-No transitions.
-Paragraphs are unfocused.
Fair
-Essay organized into clear paragraphs
-Includes introduction and conclusion
-Poor or awkward transitions.
Good
-Paragraphs are set up in a logical order, including introduction and conclusion, with transitions.
-Paragraphs begin with clear topic sentences and focus only on one idea.
Excellent
-Paragraphs build in a logical order, from introduction to conclusion, joined by clear, effective transitions.
-Paragraphs begin with effective topic sentences and focus only on one idea.
Clarity
15 %
Poor
Quotes simply appear without explanation or analysis.
Fair
Quotes are explained in a general way, but with no reference to specific language or details.
Good
Quotes are explained in some detail to show relevance to the writer's argument.
Excellent
Specific language within quotes is analyzed and explained to show relevance to the writer's argument.
Mechanics
5 %
Poor
-Enough errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar to be distracting to readers.
-Does not cite at all.
Fair
-Enough errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar to be noticeable.
Good
-Several minor errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar.
Excellent
-Free from errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Exam
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.