iRubric: Decision Making (Injury Assessment) worksheet rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Decision Making (Injury Assessment) worksheet Clinical Evaluation Papers This is a rubric to use to assist students in building skills as they relate to Athletic Training injury/illness assessment. Additionally, the purpose is to build students' ability to navigate an injury/illness assessment while also developing a strong different assessment rationale. Rubric Code: N5WAA9 By hatzelb Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

AREAS
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Good 3 pts
History 3 points	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Unacceptable History is scant. The majority of vital information to the chief complaint is missing. One or more of the following are missing: MOI, location of pain, previous injury, systemic profile, weak integration of rationale for asking the questions	Satisfactory History is age and gender appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the chief complaint. Pertinent HX questions are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Good History is complete and age and gender appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained. There is complete list of pertinent Hx questions. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Observation
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Observation 3 points	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Unacceptable Observation is scant. The majority of vital information to the observation is missing. One or more of the following are missing: postural evaluation, girth, limb length, local, regional etc.. Weak integration of rationale for the observation aspects.	Satisfactory Observation is situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition. Pertinent areas of observation are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Good Observation is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained. There is complete list of pertinent observation structures etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Palpation
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 12 pts	Satisfactory 16 pts	Good 3 pts
Palpation 3 pts	Consider Remediation Faculty may assign "0" points when work in the category is far below what is expected from a graduate-level student in this program	Unacceptable Palpation is scant. The majority of vital information to the observation is missing. One or more of the following are missing: anatomical structures, swelling, limb symmetry, deformity etc. Weak integration of rationale for the palpation aspects.	Satisfactory Palpation is situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition. Pertinent areas of palpation are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Good Palpation is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained. There is complete list of pertinent palpation structures etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Range of Motion
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Good 3 pts
ROM 3 pts.	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Unacceptable ROM is scant. The majority of vital information to the ROM is missing. One or more of the following are missing: Active, Passive, Resistive, Con, Ecc, MMT, BT. Weak integration of rationale for the ROM aspects.	Satisfactory ROM is situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition. Pertinent areas of ROM are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Good ROM is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained. There is complete list of ROM actions etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Special Tests
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Special Tests 3 pts	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Unacceptable ST are scant. The majority of vital information to the condition is missing. One or more of the following are missing: Stress tests, labs, xray, MRI/CT. Weak integration of rationale for the ST aspects.	Satisfactory ST are situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition. Pertinent areas of ST are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Good ST is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained. There is complete list of ST actions/results etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Diagnosis
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 3 pts	Satisfactory 5 pts	Good 7 pts
Diagnosis/Differential Dx.	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Unacceptable Inclusion of differential assessment is weak and little rationale is provided. Defining factors are weak and need to be more clearly identified. A retrospective is not articulated clearly or is omitted.	Satisfactory Appropriate differential conditions are included. Appropriate information to rule out the condition may be weak or need improvement. Defining factors and retrospective is provided but needs to be improved.	Good Diagnosis and Differential assessment is complete and appropriate. It is written in a logical format and strong rationale is given for the information. Defining factors are clearly and thoroughly shared as is the retrospective.
VI. Style
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Exceptional 3 pts
VI. Style 10 points	Consider Remediation Faculty may assign "0" points when work in the category is far below what is expected from a student in this program	Unacceptable The paper does not relay adequate information on the subject, is disorganized and difficult to follow. The paper has numerous errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and pagination. *There is inappropriate use of medical terminology.	Satisfactory The paper relays information but is slightly disorganized. The content has several mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or pagination. *Medical terminology is used appropriately most of the time	Exceptional The paper is well-written in a logical organized manner. The paper has appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation, and pagination. *There is consistent and appropriate use of medical terminology

Keywords:

Medical

Subjects:

Health

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric