Skip to main content
iRubric: Geography Website Rubric

iRubric: Geography Website Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Geography Website Rubric 
Rubric Code: N554CC
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Geography  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Point Total
144
  Excellent

12-10

(N/A)

Good

9-7

(N/A)

Satisfactory

6-4

(N/A)

Needs Improvement

3-0

(N/A)

Content

X2

Excellent

All information provided by the student on the website is accurate and all the requirements of the assignment have been met. In other words, there is sufficient content in this website to learn about the topic.
Good

Almost all the information provided by the student on the web site is accurate and all requirements of the assignment have been met. Or all the info. is accurate but not all of the requirements of the assignment were met.
Satisfactory

Almost all of the info. provided by the student on the web site is accurate and almost all of the requirements have been met.
Needs Improvement

There are several inaccuracies in the content provided by the students AND all requirements of content are not met.
Learning of Material

Excellent

The student has an exceptional understanding of the material included in the site and where to find additional information. Can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the website.
Good

The student has a good understanding of the material included in the site. Can answer most questions about the content and making of the website.
Satisfactory

The student has a fair understanding of the material included in the site. Can answer questions about content and creation of website but struggles at time to explain.
Needs Improvement

Student did not appear to learn much from this project. Cannot answer many questions about websites content or creation.
Links

Excellent

Every unit has a link. All links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited AND all the links work.
Good

Almost all links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited OR there are 1-2 links missing however they all worked.
Satisfactory

Most links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited or there are too few links AND some links do not work correctly.
Needs Improvement

Less than 1/2 of the links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites in the works cited or less than 1/2 of the units have links. Several links struggle to work.
Graphics

Excellent

Graphics are used for every unit and are related to the theme/purpose of the site. They are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Good

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, and are of good quality. They enhance reader interest or understanding. However, one unit is missing graphics.
Satisfactory

Graphics are present but are either of poor quality or do not all clearly relate to theme/purpose.
Needs Improvement

Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of poor quality, and do not enhance reader interest or understanding.
Layout

Excellent

The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. Graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material. Headings are used to assist viewer.
Good

The web pages have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate important elements. Elements and space are used effectively most of the time. Have headings most of the time which help organize page.
Satisfactory

The web pages have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements. Have headings some of the time.
Needs Improvement

The web pages are cluttered looking, confusing, or boring. It is often difficult to locate important elements. Headings are often missing.
Navigation

Excellent

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages (forward and back), and take the reader where they expect to go. A user does not become lost.
Good

Links for navigation are labeled, allow the reader to move easily from a page to related pages (forward and back), and internal links take the reader where they expect to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Satisfactory

Links for navigation take the reader where they expect to go, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user can get lost.
Needs Improvement

Some links do not take the reader to the sites described. A user typically feels lost or struggles to navigate.
Work Ethic

Excellent

Student always uses classroom project time well. Conversations are primarily focused on the project and things needed to get the work done. Students does NOT disrupt others. Quickly volunteers to assist others when asked.
Good

Student usually uses classroom project time well. Most conversation is focused on the project and things needed to get the work done. Student most often does NOT disrupt others. Occasionally assists others.
Satisfactory

Student usually uses classroom project time well, but occasionally distracts others from their work.
Needs Improvement

Student does not use classroom project time well OR typically is disruptive.
Color Choices/Background/Font

Excellent

Colors of background, font, and links do not detract but enhance understanding. Background adds to the theme or purpose. Fonts are consistent, easy to read.
Good

Colors of background, font, and links do not detract and are consistent. Background does not distract and is attractive. Fonts are consistent, easy to read.
Satisfactory

Colors of background, font, and links do not detract but could do a better job with enhancing site. Fonts are consistent but sometimes are difficult to read.
Needs Improvement

Colors of background, font, and links make the content hard to read. There is little consistency of font.
Interest

Excellent

The author has made an exceptional attempt to make the content of this web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Good

The author has tried to make the content of this web site interesting to the viewer(s).
Satisfactory

The author has put a lot of information in the web site but there is little evidence that the person tried to present the information in an interesting way.
Needs Improvement

The author has provided only the minimum amount of information and has not transformed the information to make it more interesting to the audience
Works Cited/Citation

Excellent

Student has used proper citation format within pages and has created a source page and graphics
page using MLA format. No mistakes.
Good

Student has used proper citation format within pages but has missed a couple citations. Student has created source page and graphics page using MLA format.
Satisfactory

Student has cited sources within pages but not always with proper format. Student created source page and graphics page using MLA format but has mistakes.
Needs Improvement

Student has cited little within pages and has an incomplete source page and/or graphics page.
Spelling/Grammar

Excellent

There are either no spelling or grammatical errors, or there may be one to two minor errors in the entire site.
Good

There are a few spelling and/or grammatical errors in the entire site.
Satisfactory

There are several spelling and/or grammatical errors in the entire site.
Needs Improvement

There are many spelling and/or grammatical errors in the entire site.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60