iRubric: Programming - Second Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Programming - Second Assignment Programming - First Assignment Equal emphasis on execution as well as quality of code. Rubric Code: N473W By rsabeti Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Programming Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Correctness 1 pts How correct is the output of the program	Poor Program does not work correctly, output is wrong most of the time or there is no output	Fair Program works correctly in general in most areas but not in all areas	Good Program works correctly in all areas and generates correct output
Execution 1 pts How smoothly does the program execute - are there any bugs	Poor Program does not execute	Fair Program executes but crashes in some areas	Good Program executes perfectly
Quality of Code
Code Structure 1 pts Structure of code, use of functions and procedures, code segmentation	Poor Long code segments, improper usage of functions, functions with side effects	Fair Code structure needs work	Good Code structure has perfectly followed guidelines. Short code segments, proper use of functions
Naming Convension 1 pts How closely is the naming convension for variables, functions, and files are followed	Poor Names are too cryptic, inconsistent, or do not follow any convension	Fair Names follow the convensions in most part, but need work	Good All names are easy to understand, consistent (in both wording and capitalization) and follow the guidelines
Comments 1 pts Code is commented properly	Poor Code is not commented at all	Fair Code is commented but not sufficiently	Good Code is sufficiently commented with comments on every file, code segment, variable, and function.
Style 1 pts How closely are styling conventions for comments, indentation, and code structure is followed	Poor Not followed at all, or poorly followed	Fair Followed for the most part	Good Followed all the time
Code Reuse 1 pts How well code reuse is implemented	Poor Too much redundancy in code	Fair Occasional code redundancy	Good No code redundancy