Skip to main content
iRubric: yr2_oral presentation_lit assignment rubric

iRubric: yr2_oral presentation_lit assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
yr2_oral presentation_lit assignment 
Oral Presentation Rubric
Oral Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code: N46A2C
By eiliyah
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Literature Presentation Year 2
  Outstanding

5 pts

Great

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Reasonable

2 pts

What happened?

1 pts

Individual Assessment
Enthusiasm

Outstanding

Facial expressions and body language generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Great

Facial expressions and body language sometimes generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Good

Facial expressions and body language are used to try to generate enthusiasm, but seem somewhat faked.
Reasonable

Very little use of facial expressions or body language. Did not generate much interest in topic being presented.
What happened?

Student made no effort to show enthusiasm.
Preparation

Outstanding

Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.
Great

Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals.
Good

The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.
Reasonable

It is clear that both preparation and rehearsal were lacking.
What happened?

Student does not seem at all prepared to present.
Speaks Clearly

Outstanding

Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words.
Great

Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word.
Good

Speaks clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word.
Reasonable

Often mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word.
What happened?

Mostly mumbling, could not be heard by audience members. No effort to transfer information to audience.
Concept understanding

Outstanding

Demonstrates a complete and excellent understanding of relevance of prop / costume/song/layout to the character and play.

Explanations are specific, illustrative, and contain extensively developed details.
Great

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of relevance of prop / costume/song/layout to the character and play.

Explanations are specific and contain fully developed details.
Good

Demonstrates a good understanding of relevance of prop / costume/song/layout to the character and play.

Explanations are adequate and contain sufficiently developed details.
Reasonable

Demonstrates rudimentary understanding of relevance of prop / costume/song/layout to the character and play.

Explanations are limited and contain partially developed details
What happened?

Demonstrate inadequate understanding of relevance of prop / costume/song/layout to the character and play.

Explanations are underdeveloped and vague with many confusing details.
Team Assessment
Visuals / Props

Outstanding

All end products are consistently of superior quality and demonstrate a deep understanding of subject.

They are also highly consistent with text.

A high level of creativity is clearly demonstrated.
Great

All end products are of excellent quality and demonstrate an above average understanding of subject.

They are also mostly consistent with text.

A very good level of creativity is demonstrated.
Good

Some end products are of good quality and demonstrate a good understanding of subject.

They are also consistent with text.

An adequate level of creativity is demonstrated.
Reasonable

At least two end products are of acceptable quality and demonstrate a reasonable understanding of subject.

They sometimes
consistent with text.

Some creativity is demonstrated
What happened?

At least one product is of acceptable quality and demonstrates a reasonable understanding of subject.

They are
loosely consistent with text.

Little creativity is demonstrated.
team work

Outstanding

Team works seamlessly together to put together a coherent presentation.

Members' roles are clearly defined and easily identifiable most of the time.

Workload is very well distributed.
Great

Team works well together to put together a coherent presentation.

Members' roles are clearly defined and easily identifiable.

Workload is distributed evenly.
Good

Team works reasonably well together to put together a coherent presentation.

Members have defined roles.

Work is distributed fairly – but with individual focus only.
Reasonable

Team works together to put together a coherent presentation but some poor organisation is evident.

Members have loose role assignments.

Uneven work distribution.
What happened?

Individuals work to put together a presentation but poor organisation is often evident.

No clearly-defined roles.

Not clear who completed which tasks and/or very uneven distribution of work.



Keywords:
  • Oral Presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60