Skip to main content
iRubric: ICP002 - Multiple Intelligence Presentation rubric

iRubric: ICP002 - Multiple Intelligence Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ICP002 - Multiple Intelligence Presentation 
As a team, participants will apply specific aspects of Multiple Intelligence Theory to redesign or create a lesson which meeds the needs of various types of learner
Rubric Code: N3W3A2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project/Presentation
 

Exceeds

25 pts


Good

20 pts


Fair

15 pts


Poor

10 pts


No attempt except research in class.

0 pts

Content

25

Specific aspects of MI clearly addressed and applied in lesson. Thorough understanding of MI and related theories demonstratated.
20

Some aspects of MI addressed, with limited application.
15

One aspect of MI addressed; minimal application or application not clear
10

Insufficient preparation done for the presentation of the information, it therefore lacks many elements of what is expected.
0

Minimal or no effort fo prepare and present
Creativity and New Technology

25

Creative thought and ideas present. New technology applied appropriately and effectively.
20

Some creativity apparent, and an honest attempt made to introduce new technologies.
15

Limited creativity, and limited use of technology, or technology is not innovative (e.g. powerpoint) Information may be presented in an unorganized fashion.
10

Unsuccessful attempts at creativity and the innovative use of technology.
0

Little or no creativity, and minimal effort apparent.
Presentation and Teamwork

25

Presentation flowed well, was exciting. Participants were fully engaged throughout the presentation. Objectives were clear, and accomplished as stated. FUn!
20

Presentation was interesting. . Objectives were clear, and mostly accomplished.
15

Reasonable flow, activities were somewhat interesting.
Expectaions were unclear, or assessment was not directly related to the stated expectations or learning outcomes.
10

Activities were poorly explained, unclear, or did not accomplish the overall learning outcomes of the presentation,
0

The candidate made no attempt at engagement, activity, interactivity, or participant collaboration.
Individual Summary Paper

25

Summarizes clearly how lesson was developed or changed by applying MI. Clear references to readings. Articles and/or theories cited. Perfect technical structure and grammar. Three pages or more in length.
20

Some indication of how lesson was developed or changed by applying MI. References to readings made, and some citations. Above average technically and grammatically. 2-3 pages in length
15

Limited indication of application of MI theory to development or change in letter. Below average grammar, etc. Under 2 pages in length
10

Work is done with little effort, quality is not to the level required by the qualified candidate. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
0

The candidate made no attempt to connect anything with anything










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60