Skip to main content

iRubric: More to Explore rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
More to Explore 
A rubric for grading the project 3 wiki page
Rubric Code: N36B24
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric More to Explore
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

5 pts

Reserve Topic
2 pts

Poor

Directions were not followed
Fair

Directions were followed somewhat but instructor intervention was required. i.e. topic had alredy been chosen, title of page was not clearly related to topic, etc.
Good

Directions were followed to create a page, add first name and reserve a page and topic.
Overview
10 pts

Poor

Overview was not provided or was not clear.
Fair

Overview was not clear or did not reflect student's own understanding of the topic.
Good

Overview of the topic was provided. Overview was clear and concise and reflects and understanding of the topic.
Examples
5 pts

Poor

No examples were given
Fair

Examples were not appropriate and/or did not help to expand an understanding of the topic.
Good

Examples or links to examples were included and appropriate to the topic
Resources
5 pts

Poor

No additional resources were provided or were not appropriate to the topic.
Fair

Some resources were provided but one or more links were not made or did not work.
Good

Good resources on the topic were cited and included. Links were accurate.
Impact
5 pts

Poor

The impact of this topic was not explored.
Fair

The impact of this topic was not clearly identified.
Good

The impact of this topic on the school library media program was clearly and thoughtfully delineated.
Usefulness
5 pts

Poor

The discussion, ideas, examples and resources on this page would not be useful to other school library media specialists.
Fair

The discussion, ideas, examples and resources on this page would have limited usefulness to other school library media specialists.
Good

The discussion, ideas, examples and resources on this page would be useful to other school library media specialists.
Appearance
3 pts

Poor

Page was not professional in appearance.
Fair

Page was somewhat profesional in appearance but lacked cohesive look, graphics or other elements.
Good

Page was professional in appearance and included graphics, videos, slideshows or other elements beyond basic text.



Keywords:
  • research, media for children and young adults, wikis

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178