Skip to main content
iRubric: AH225 Scheduled Homework V rubric

iRubric: AH225 Scheduled Homework V rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AH225 Scheduled Homework V 
Mandatory – due Nov. 3/Nov. 6* in class and on workspaces *The debate will take place in class on Nov. 3. The written summaries of arguments are due on debate day. The “Proportional Representation” forms are due in class in the following session (Nov. 6).
Rubric Code: N3274A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Homework I
10 % Sapir-Whorf Debate
  Fail

0 pts

Weak

1 pts

Satisfactory

5 pts

Very Good

10 pts

Individual effort
10 %

Student contributed a satisfactory percentage of the total team's effort

Fail

Proportional Representation Forms indicate that student made no contribution to the team's total effort.
Weak

Proportional Representation Forms suggest that student contributed significantly
less than other team members.
Satisfactory

Proportional Representation Forms suggest that student contributed slightly
less than most other team members, but still made a contribution to the team's total effort.
Very Good

Proportional Representation Forms suggest that student contributed at least as much as most other team members.
Submission of documents
10 %

Team prepares and submits all of the required documentation for this task

Fail

Team does not submit any written documents.
Weak

Team submits a written summary of arguments which does not contain an MLA bibliography and/or in-text citations; or, two or more members do not submit Proportional Representation Forms.
Satisfactory

Team submits a written summary of arguments complete with MLA bibliography and in-text citations and all but one member submits Proportional Representation Forms.
Very Good

Team submits a written summary of arguments complete with MLA bibliography and in-text citations and all members submit Proportional Representation Forms.
Research
20 %

Team is able to conduct research on the topic prior to the debate, consulting and making reference to at least 3 sources from an available list

Fail

No secondary sources are referenced..
Weak

1-2 sources from the list provided on workspaces have been consulted and referenced in the summary of arguments.
Satisfactory

At least 3 sources from the list provided on workspaces have been consulted and referenced in the summary of arguments.
Very Good

At least 3 sources from the list provided on workspaces have been consulted and referenced in the summary of arguments. Team makes verbal reference to all three of these sources as support for arguments during the course of the debate.
Collaborating to Create Arguments
30 %

Team is able to work together to generate arguments in support of their standpoint in the debate, and they are able to generate arguments which refute the anticipated arguments of the opponents

Fail

Written summary of arguments contains fewer than 3 arguments in support of team's standpoint in the debate. These arguments are not vocalized during the debate and no refutation arguments are provided.
Weak

Written summary of arguments contains 3 arguments in support of team's standpoint in the debate. These arguments are not vocalized during the debate and no refutation arguments are provided.
Satisfactory

Written summary of arguments contains 3 arguments in support of team's standpoint in the debate. Team vocalizes at least some of these arguments during the debate. Written summary contains arguments which refute the anticipated arguments of the opponents; however, none of these arguments are vocalized during the debate.
Very Good

Written summary of arguments contains 3 arguments in support of team's standpoint in the debate. Team vocalizes these arguments during the debate. Written summary contains arguments which refute the anticipated arguments of the opponents. Team vocalizes these arguments during the debate.
Team work
20 %

Team is able to work together during the debate itself to modify the strategy for the debate

Fail

Team has not devised a flexible strategy for debate. No consultation takes place between team members during the course of the debate. No attempt is made to address the opponents' arguments at any point.
Weak

Team has devised a flexible strategy for the presentation of arguments. Team members consult with one another and with designated speakers about the team's strategy during the course of the debate. However, speakers do not address their opponents' arguments, either immediately, or at a later point in the debate.
Satisfactory

Team has devised a flexible strategy for the presentation of arguments. Team members consult with one another and with designated speakers about the team's strategy during the course of the debate, with the result that speakers sometimes address their opponents' arguments, either immediately, or at a later point in the debate.
Very Good

Team has devised a flexible strategy for the presentation of arguments. Team members consult with one another and with designated speakers about the team's strategy during the course of the debate, with the result that speakers address their opponents' arguments, either immediately, or at a later point in the debate.
Timing
10 %

Student is able to stay within the specified time limits for speakers

Fail

All students either go over or fall under the specified time limits
Weak

Some speakers on the team stay within the specified time limits
Satisfactory

Most speakers on the team stay within the specified time limits
Very Good

All speakers on the team stay within the specified time limits



Keywords:
  • language, sociolinguistics, culture, linguistic relativity

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60