iRubric: Unsolved Crime rubric

-Content was basic and did not go beyond personal beliefs.
-Research was not cited, incomplete, or biased.
-It is evident that presentation is inadequately researched. Major lack of factual information.
-All key information is incorrect,
-Student has included less than two facts regarding the topic

-Content was adequate and research was sufficient for the task
-Only a few facts are shared with class.
--Presentation is giving information based on opinions/assumptions.
-Information was incorrect or incomplete
-Student has answered at least 2 of the question words.

-Content was well organized and relevant. research was well done and cited correctly.
-Facts are shared about the crime.
-Key information is shared but some info might be lacking.
-Student has answered at least 3 of the question words.

-Research was advanced and cited many sources.
-Facts are shared about the issue.
-Group has adequately research and taught the topic.
-Student has included at least 4 -question words.

-Student did not understand the controversial topic clearly
-Language usage is somewhat appropriate; many grammatical errors.
-Voices show lack of interest in topic.
Shows little or no interest in topic.
-Fails to increase audience understanding of knowledge of topic.

-Information is somewhat succinct; sometimes wordy.
-Language usage is mostly inappropriate; voice is are inappropriately loud or soft; unclear.
-Shows little or mixed feelings about the topic being presented.
-Raises audience understanding and knowledge of some points.

-Student seemed confident in presentation and included supporting evidence
-Solid delivery of presentation. Information presented is mostly succinct.
-Language usage is mostly appropriate; few grammatical errors.
-Voice is generally loud, but drops off at times.
-Shows some enthusiastic feelings about topic.
-Raises audience understanding and awareness of most points.

-Exceptional delivery of article presentation with smooth transition of fact summary, analysis and opinion or discussion-based questions.
-Language usage is appropriate and professional.
-Maintains eye contact and uses a clear voice.
-Demonstrates strong enthusiasm about topic during entire presentation.
-Significantly increases audience understanding and knowledge of topic; convinces audience to recognize the validity and importance of the subject.

-Speaker did not enhance or advance the debate, was unprepared, or comments were inappropriate.
-Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions and reads off slides.

Student is at ease with content, but fails to elaborate and mostly reads off slides.
-Speaker did adequate work to help their team, spoke clearly, but may not have explained as clearly as possible
-Students were not prepared to encourage discussion.
-

-Student is informed of topic and use tool and only reads off slides sometimes.
-Speaker was an asset to their team, made progress toward achieving goal, spoke clearly, gave good information
-Student demonstrates full knowledge with explanations and elaboration.

-Student is informed of topic and use tool and not direct reading from screen.
-Speaker was an extreme asset to their team, produced a clear, concise, and well-researched argument
--Student demonstrates full knowledge with explanations and elaboration.

Does not appear to be listening. No applause.

Sometimes does not appear to be listening. Little applause.

Listens intently but has one distracting noise or movement.

Phone is off desk and out of sight. Listens intently without distractions or talking. Enthusiastic applause.