Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Shattered Value Drawing; Art I project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Shattered Value Drawing; Art I project
Shattered Value Drawing; Art I project
Students will create a drawing using different values. They will have a contour drawing that they break into shapes. Subject matter should appear 3D and have strong emphasis in the composition.
Rubric Code:
MXWAAX5
By
JuliePeters
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Shattered Value Drawing
Level 1
1 pts
Level 2
2 pts
Level 3
3 pts
Level 4
4 pts
Level 5
5 pts
Craftsmanship with value changes.
Level 1
*The student did not try to use value change.
Level 2
*The student attempted to use value, but most of the drawing was gray.
*The blending was not smooth and only a couple value changes were present.
Level 3
*There are 3 different values present in the drawing.
*The blending is choppy and could have been smoothed out.
Level 4
*At least 5 value changes are present and the drawing did a great job expressing the extreme white and very dark areas.
*The blending is pretty smooth, but still has some stripes visible.
Level 5
*The student did an excellent job using all 9 value changes and making certain the light and darks were really evident.
*The blending was outstanding.
Repeated Patterns; composition
Level 1
*No pattern used.
*Designs do not connect with one another. No overlapping or consideration of composition.
Level 2
*There was a pattern used in only a few areas of the drawing.
*Items were very centered in the composition.
*shatter lines go up to the object but not through it.
Level 3
*A few shapes were repeated.
*Student used the whole picture plane.
*Overlapping was started, but could have been more effective. Shatter lines should go through the objects.
Level 4
*Shapes, direction of lines, and variety was considered.
*Student used the entire picture plane and began to consider composition.
*Nice overlapping of objects. Shatter lines go through objects.
Level 5
*The use of pattern is outstanding. The composition is interesting and fun to look at.
Effort
Level 1
*The student did not finish the work.
Level 2
*The student did not finish the work in a satisfactory manner.
Level 3
*The student finished the project but it lacked finished touches. The project could be improved upon with little effort.
Level 4
*The student completed the project in an above average manner, yet more could have been done.
Level 5
*The student gave an effort far beyond the requirements of the project.
Creativity/ Originality
Level 1
*The piece shows little or no evidence of original thought.
*There are no preliminary thumbnails or sketches.
Level 2
*The piece shows little evidence of original thought.
*There are minimal attempts at preliminary thumbnails or sketches.
Level 3
*The student's work lacked sincere originality.
*There are attempts at thumbnail sketches but they do not show adequate problem solving efforts.
Level 4
*The student's work demonstrates originality.
*The student has created several sketches or thumbnails in an effort to work through problem solving.
Level 5
*The student's work demonstrates originality.
*Shows evidence of planning and problem solving through complex thumbnails that show the process of thought.
Academic Terms/ Vocabulary
Level 1
*Paid no attention to the position of the subject matter and the craftsmenship.
Level 2
*The size of objects, placement, and value changes were barely considered and craftsmanship was not a priority.
Level 3
*The size of objects, placement, and value changes were considered. But the placement of values and blending on the shapes needs more work.
Level 4
*The project shows good consideration to the composition of the design and has considered craftsmanship.
Level 5
*The final piece is interesting (visible consideration to the placement of the objects). Compition and craftsmanship were above and beyond the requirement.
Cooperation
Level 1
*Student does not show a willingness to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Does not work well with others.
*The student is often not in their seat when the bell rings and/ or rushes to finish.
Level 2
*The student is rarely willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Sometimes works well with others.
*Student is sometimes out of their seat when the bell rings.
*Uses minimum amount of time.
Level 3
*The student is sometimes willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Students will work with others only if required.
*Student is in seat when the bell rings and uses studio time appropriately.
Level 4
*The student is usually willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*The student works well with others.
*Student is in their seat when the bell rings and utilizes the studio time and clean up time.
Level 5
*The student is always willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Student always works well with others.
*Student always uses studio time and clean up time well.
Responsiveness
Level 1
*The student showed negative responses throughout the development of the piece from introduction, demonstrations, studio time, to finish.
*The student did not ask for help.
*Off task a majority of the time.
Level 2
*The student showed negative responses, at times, throughout the development of the piece.
*The student seldomly asked for help.
*Off task throughout the project.
Level 3
*The student showed positive response most of the time during the development of the piece.
*The student asked for help when finding something difficult, but kept trying.
*Off task at different times during project.
Level 4
*The student showed positive response all of the time during the development of the piece.
*The student asked for help and responded well to suggestions.
*Seldom off task.
Level 5
*The student showed positive responses all of the time during the development of the piece and was appropriately helpful to others and/ or the teacher during the process.
*The student asked questions and showed their understanding in the work.
*Always on task.
Value change
Level 1
*No Value change within each individual shape.
*No contrast present.
Level 2
*Value change within each shape is basic. *Not a lot of contrast in each shape. A lot of Gray values.
Level 3
*Value change within most shapes is basic.
*Missing contrast in some of the shapes.
Level 4
*Each shape has individual consideration to the value change.
*Contrast from light to dark was considered within each shape.
Level 5
*Each shape has individual consideration to the value change.
*Great contrast from light to dark within each shape.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.