- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Science Journal Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Science Journal Rubric Science Journal Rubric Evaluate science journals Rubric Code: MXW267B By krsebastian Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Assignment Grade Levels: K-5

Science Journal
	Emergent 1 pts	Approaching 2 pts	Meets 3 pts	Exceeds 4 pts
Science Vocabulary	Emergent Student made no attempt to use any scientific words discussed in class or given in the example.	Approaching Student made some attempt to use scientific words discussed in class or given in the example. Words did not always make sense in the sentences.	Meets Student made a good attempt to use scientific words discussed in class or given in the example. Words fit well with sentences.	Exceeds Student made a very good attempt to use scientific words discussed in class or given in the example. Other scientific words were added that add value to answers.
Scientific Drawings	Emergent Data boxes, diagrams, and/or graphs are somewhat large (clearly readable), somewhat labeled and include some detail.	Approaching Data boxes, diagrams, and/or graphs are large & mostlt readable, mostly labeled, and include most detail.	Meets Data boxes, diagrams, and/or graphs are large, clearly labeled, and include detail.	Exceeds Data boxes, diagrams, and/or graphs are large, accurately labeled, and include relevant detail.
Understanding	Emergent Does not demonstrate understanding of science topic. Sentences are not clear.	Approaching Demonstrates little understanding of science topic. Sentences are missing information.	Meets Demonstrates a good understanding of science topic. Sentences give the required information.	Exceeds Demonstrates excellent understanding of science topic. Sentences give extra, relevant information.
Conventions	Emergent Some writing conventions are missing and many known words are misspelled. This makes the work very difficult to understand.	Approaching Some writing conventions are missing and/or some known words are misspelled. This makes the work a bit difficult to understand.	Meets Most writing conventions are present and most words are spelled correctly. Any mistakes do not detract from the work.	Exceeds Few to no mistakes were made. None of the mistakes detract from the work.
Neatness/Completion	Emergent Writing is difficult to read due to messiness or size. Words are not spaced and work is not neatly written Entries are not dated. Work is incomplete OR several days late.	Approaching Writing is somewhat messy. Work is partially incomplete.	Meets Writing is neat. Date is included. Work is complete to requirements.	Exceeds Writing shows best effort. Each entry is dated. Work goes beyond requirements (more, relevant information, diagrams, etc.).