Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: 1920s project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
1920s project
Gender Inequality
Rubric Code:
MXA7X3X
By
mrsbunnell
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Working Conditions
Exceptional
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Essential Question
Exceptional
"Thick" essential question. Original, well thought out, open ended question.
Good
"Thick" essential question. Could be better thought out. Is the question given by the prompt.
Fair
"Thin" essential question, can be answered easily without much though or research.
Poor
No essential question.
Quality of response
Exceptional
Clear response to the essential question and topic.
Good
Opinion or response is moderately clear. More clarification is needed.
Fair
Audience cannot understand response or opinion.
Poor
No response to essential question.
Unit Vocabulary
Exceptional
Presentation utilizes at least 5 unit vocabulary terms in a way that show thought and understanding.
Good
Presentation utilizes less than 5 unit vocabulary terms. Shows thought and understanding of the terms.
Fair
Presentation uses few vocabulary terms, show limited thought and understanding of the terms
Poor
Presentation uses no vocabulary terms. Shows no understanding of the terms.
Research
Exceptional
Project cites and uses more than 3 reputable sources.
Good
Project cites and uses 3 reputable sources.
Fair
Project uses and cites less than 3 sources. Sources are not known for their validity or non bias.
Poor
Project has no cited sources.
Group Dynamic
Exceptional
Group has adhered to the Project management process. Everyone participates and fulfills their roles. All members are heard and no one is left behind.
Good
Group has adhered to the project management process. Most everyone participates and fulfills their roles. Most members are heard.
Fair
Group has not adhered to the project management process. One or two people did all of the work and the group did not assign or fulfill roles.
Poor
Group did not adhere to the project management process. No work was done and it was chaos.
Quality of product
Exceptional
Maximum effort is shown, product is creative and well produced.
Good
Effort is shown, product is creative, and production is of average quality.
Fair
Product needs more effort, is not creative and production is of less than average quality.
Poor
Product did not take any effort, is not creative, and product is not present or is of substandard quality.
Subjects:
History
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.