iRubric: Case study analysis rubric

Case study findings lacks depth and/or connection. Student makes few connections or inappropriate connections among findings, course concepts and data gathered in field.

Provides a thoughtful analysis incorporating literature review. Student connects findings to clinical concepts; however, specific quotes, principles, or theories may be lacking or examples may be used inappropriately. Connection to data gathered is not present or minimal

Provides an in-depth, critical analysis of Case Study activity findings together with appropriate literature reference. Candidate insightfully and appropriately connects findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings.

Highlights knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. However, provides little to no discussion of how reader should apply “lessons learned” to future clinical practices. Submitted 2-3 days late with or without instructor consultation.

Highlights knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. Discusses ways reader can use “lessons learned” in future teaching practices; however, future applications to practice may be vague and/or lack concrete action steps he/she recommends. Submitted 12-24 hours late with or without instructor consultation

Illuminates knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. Discusses specific ways reader can use “lessons learned” in future clinical practices, outlining specific concrete action steps he/she recommends. Submitted on due date or 1-2 days early.