Skip to main content

iRubric: Board Game Design and Construction rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Board Game Design and Construction Board Game Design and Construction This peer evaluation was designed by the students. Rubric Code: MBC82A By stampcat2 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Peer evaluation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Awesome! 5 pts
Rules and object of the game	Poor -Make no sense and we are not able to play the game.	Fair -Written as phrases are very confusing -Made us think of many major problems and issues that can happen while playing - Misspelled words	Good -Written as phrases and a little confusing -Made us think of one major issue and many minor ones -Punctuation errors	Excellent Written in sentences Somewhat easy to understand -Made us think of minor questions	Awesome! -Written in complete sentences and are very easy to follow -Easy to understand -Correct conventions
Board Design	Poor -Confusing, board has a boring design -Doesn't relate to the theme of the game at all.	Fair -Way too many graphics or the board is bare -Not appealing to play. doesn't really relate to the theme of the game	Good -Too many graphics or not enough -The board is somewhat easy to follow -Slightly relates to the theme of the game	Excellent -A few too many graphics or just not enough -Somewhat too hard to follow the board design -Relates somewhat well to the theme of the game	Awesome! -Creative -Looks appealing to play -Easy to follow -Relates well to the theme of the game
Playing the game	Poor -Could not figure how to play - Too frustrating!	Fair -Could figure out basically how to play, but was confused at times -It either dragged on too long to win or was way too easy to win	Good -Figured out how to play, but was still sightly confused -The game took somewhat too long to win or was too slightly too short	Excellent -Figured out somewhat easily -The amount of time play seem somewhat okay -It was somewhat fun	Awesome! -Fun, easy to play, right amount of time to play the game
Pieces/Cards	Poor -Not enough pieces and the ones that were used did not go with the theme of the game -the cards/questions did not make any sense	Fair -Seemed to missing some pieces -The cards/questions really did not fit the theme of the game and were too difficult or way too easy.	Good -Enough pieces and somewhat matched the theme of the game -The cards/questions were somewhat too difficult or too easy	Excellent -Enough pieces and they seemed to match the theme of the game -The cards/questions had a few that were too difficult or too easy, but overall worked well	Awesome! -Enough pieces and they went well with game's theme. -The cards/questions worked well with the game, just right in difficulty
Would you play the game again?	Poor No! Could not play it to begin with!	Fair Would not play again because it was too confusing.	Good Probably would not play again, it was either to long or too short.	Excellent Probably play again. It was somewhat fun	Awesome! Definitely play again. It was fun to play. You ought to get a patent on this one!

Keywords:

peer evaluation

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Arts and Design rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202