Skip to main content

iRubric: Set Director- Music Video rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Set Director- Music Video 
Rubric Code: MA23B5
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric director rubric preproduction
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

knowledge

Poor

Director has no vision. There are limited to no directions as to how the video will flow together.
Fair

Vision is minimal. There is little done on the story board. The scenes look rushed/unorganized. The music/locations are not the best.
Good

Storyboard and script completed with evidence of shot types, camera angles, shot duration, music choice, exact locations
Excellent

Well done storyboard with nicely done drawings showing transitions, duration shots, location, neat, meticulous, exact directions given for any director to follow.
thinking

Poor

No real evidence of pre-planning. Little to no leadership skills.
Fair

There is some evidence of planning, research, and expectations of actors.
Good

Planning evidence with scouting, lyrics, music choice, internet research
Excellent

Fully completed documentation including daily logs with evidence of challenges and what was learned, lots of information about the production planning, including acting and mood expectations.
communication

Poor

Unable to answer questions; uses "yes" or "no" answers; does not provide detailed answers; failure to cite specific examples.
Fair

Provides abstract answers to questions / does not use specific examples.
Good

Provides clear & concise answers to questions citing specific examples.
Excellent

Provides clear concise answers to questions citing specific examples and how this experience relates to the specific project.

** Must include having the ability to get the actors to do what he/she sees.
management skills

Poor

Unable to answer questions; uses "yes" or "no" answers; does not provide detailed answers; failure to cite specific examples.
Fair

Provides abstract answers to questions / does not use specific examples.
Good

Provides clear & concise answers to questions citing specific examples.
Excellent

Provides clear concise answers to questions citing specific examples and how this experience relates to the specific project.

Will be determined by the group, after a post-assignments assessment is given.
finished product

Poor

Video not finished by due date.
Fair

Video finished by due date but has poor quality. Looks rushed and/or sloppy. Does not have all requirements.
Good

Video is finished by due date, has all requirements but still has some large flaws.
Excellent

Video is finished on time, is creatives, has all requirements, and has no visibly large mistakes.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178