Skip to main content

iRubric: Chapter Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Chapter Presentation Rubric Educ 635 Chapter Presentation Rubric Students will present chapters on instructional methods. Rubric Code: M9B38W By nwrosch Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Chapter Presentation
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Coverage (x2)	Poor Chapter is presented in an unclear fashion. Information does not support the chapters assignment.	Fair There is a great deal of important information that has been left out. <BR> Coverage is not at graduate level.	Good Sufficient information that relates to the chapter and many good points are made but there's an uneven balance and little variation of material.	Excellent Chapter section is covered thoroughly and completely;all points are made with relevance for the chapter. Outside supporting material may have been added for more impact.
Mastery of Content	Poor A lack of familiarity with the subject matter is demonstrated through omission of material or miss interpretation of such concepts and theories.	Fair A basic grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated.	Good A thorough grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated.	Excellent Presenters showed comprehensive grasp of the subject matter demonstrated by understanding of relevant concepts theories and issues.
Presentation Organization	Poor Students failed to introduce the topic properly and no attempts were made to engage the audience.	Fair Presenters attempted to introduce the topic, attempt to provide some context as well as engaging the audience, however, these attempts may not have been effective.	Good Presenters introduced the topic and have provided a context for presentation and made an attempt to engage the audience.	Excellent Chapter section is introduced in proper context and engages the audience.
Interactivity	Poor Presenters delivery was weak.	Fair Presenters talked to students and did not interact with students.	Good Presenters utilized some interactive instruction.	Excellent Presenters presented information in an interactive way. Presenters involved learners in presentation.
Visual Aids	Poor Visual aids were of poor quality and/or distracted the audience and were hard to read and understand.<BR> Or, no visual needs were used.	Fair Some related facts were presented, but students run off topic and lost their audience. Presented facts with little or no imagination or creativity.	Good Presentation of facts with some interesting "twists"; and held the audience attention most of the time.	Excellent Visual aids enhanced presentation, and kept the audience interest.
Teaching Tools	Poor No recommendations were given or recommendations given were not supportive or directly connected to the content presented.	Fair Presenters shared 1 - 2 good tools that were appropriate and supportive of the content presented. Other tools were vaguely connected with the content presented.	Good Presenters shared 3 - 4 good tools or resources that were appropriate and supportive of the content presented. Other tools presented were somewhat connected to the content.	Excellent Presenters shared at least 5 good tools or resources for teachers to explore on their own. Recommendations were appropriate and supportive of the content presented.
Hands-On Activity	Poor The activity was not connected to the content and was not helpful in understanding the material.	Fair The activity was somewhat connected with the content. It was somewhat helpful in understanding the material.	Good The activity included most students and connected with the content. It was helpful in understanding the material.	Excellent The activity included all students and clearly connected with the content and was meaningful and helpful in understanding the material.
Timing	Poor The presentation went beyond the allotted time, or was too short. (+ or - 15 minutes)	Fair The presentation went beyond the allotted time, or was too short. (+ or - 10 minutes)	Good The presentation went beyond the allotted time, or was too short. (+ or - 5 minutes)	Excellent The presentation was within the allotted time. (30 minutes) It was neither rushed nor did it drag.

Keywords:

Chapter Presentations on Teaching Methods

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Social Sciences rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178