Skip to main content
iRubric: Annotated Bibliography - Middle Ages I-Search rubric

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography - Middle Ages I-Search rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Annotated Bibliography - Middle Ages I-Search 
Annotated Bibliography
Selection and critique of research materials for presentation on a topic related to the Middle Ages.
Rubric Code: M8A7C6
By rustineuro
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Annotated Bibliography of Resources
  High Distinction

(N/A)

Distinction

(N/A)

Pass

(N/A)

Below average

(N/A)

Fail

(N/A)

MLA Formatting

High Distinction

MLA formatting was accurately followed, and included correct placement of authors' names, title of study, spacing guidelines, etc. 10 or more resources were used and 7 were not "website" sources.
After listing identifying information for the assignment, students should offer an introduction to orient the reader to the purpose and subject(s) of the annotated bibliography, the search strategy pursued, and the overall result of the research.
Distinction

Few MLA formatting errors, e.g. authors, spacing, capitol letters. At least 10 sources were cited and 6 were not "website" sources.
After listing identifying information for the assignment, students should offer a brief introduction to orient the reader to the purpose and subject(s) of the annotated bibliography.
Pass

MLA style formatting included, but contained errors (E.g.spacing, punctuation or capitalization). 10 sources were cited but 5 or more were "website" sources.
Below average

MLA style formatting not included. Fewer than 10 sources were cited.
Fail

No Annotated Bibliography has been provided.
Introduction

High Distinction

The introduction provides a clear rationale for the choice of topic engages the reader and creates interest. The topic is clearly highly relevant to at least one of the Essential Questions for the I-Search. The purpose of the paper is clear.
Distinction

The introduction adequately explains the background and rationale for chosen topic but may lack detail or argument. The topic is relevant to at least one of the Essential Questions for the I-Search Essential Questions. States the intention of the paper.
Pass

The topic is relevant to at least one of the I-Search Essential Questions or may be generally relevant to one Essential Question. The student's reason for subject choice is vague. The intention of the paper is stated but is unclear, broad or unfocused
Below average

Background details are a random collection of information, unclear and not related to the topic. The topic may or may not have relevance to the one of the Essential Questions for the I-search. Purpose of paper is vague or unclear.
Fail

Student does not provide an introduction to the assignment
Search Strategy

High Distinction

Discussion of search strategy clearly and succinctly outlines the databases accessed, the keywords and selection criteria used. Discussion reflects a deepening understanding of the topic as the search proceeds. Strategy is focused, relevant and clearly effective.
Distinction

Thorough, clear discussion of search strategy; key elements clearly and succinctly outlined and described. Strategy is focused, relevant and clearly effective. Lacks a reflection of the student's deepening understanding of the topic as the search proceeds.
Pass

Adequate discussion of search strategy and key elements. Discussion requires more focus & clarity to gain more credit.
Below average

Discussion of search strategy misses key elements (eg. no mention of keywords or selestion criteria). Discussion lacks focus and/ or relevance.
Fail

No effort to discuss or search strategy.
Analysis and critique

High Distinction

Analysis and critique of topic evident throughout annotations. The annotations display a clear, well reasoned synthesis of the findings of the resources including a clear statement on the quality of the research and their contribution to addressing at least one of the Essential Questions of the I-Search
Distinction

Findings are considered but not necessarily connected. The annotations contain some description of the findings but the analysis of quality of the research or their contribution to addressing the Essential Questions is not consistent throughout the paper.
Pass

The paper describes the sources generally and may discuss either their strengths or weakness.
Quotes may be used, but with little evidence of analysis to support their relationship to at least one Essential Question for the I-Search. There are a few connections drawn between sources.
Below average

There is general failure to support statements or evidence presented. There is no attempt made to critique the literature sourced or link to at least one of the Essential Questions for the I-Search. Work is descriptive with no evidence of analysis. Inadequate amount of literature cited.
Fail

There has been no effort to appraise the research



Keywords:
  • bibliography, critique


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60