Skip to main content
iRubric: Teacher Evaluation of Literature Circles rubric

iRubric: Teacher Evaluation of Literature Circles rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Teacher Evaluation of Literature Circles 
Teacher Evaluation of Literature Circles
Assesses students productivity and participation within literature circles.
Rubric Code: M7B737
By tylerwood
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Powered by iRubric Literature Circles
  Excellent

5 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Discussion Director

Excellent

Wrote at least 3 interesting questions to discuss with the group. The questions were challenging and thought provoking.
Fair

Wrote 3 questions to share with the group. The questions weren't challenging and had no simple answers.
Poor

Provided less that 3 questions. Questions had simple yes/no answers.
Vocabulary Enricher

Excellent

Found and defined 5 unfamilar words, and identified 4 important/unique/interesting words and discussed them The page numbers were provided and clear, easy to understand definitions for each word were used.
Fair

Found and defined 3 unfamilar words, and identified 2 important/unique/interesting words. Discussion of words was attempted, but was too brief. The page numbers and defintions for each word were provided.
Poor

Found and defined 2 or fewer unfamilar words, and identified 1 important/unique/interesting word. No discussion of the words was attempted. Page numbers missing and/or unclear definitions.
Plot Analyst

Excellent

Wrote thorough analysis of the plot. Work displayed an ability to find and comment on specific events or terms. 5 key points were discussed from the reading assignment.
Fair

Wrote a brief analysis of the plot. Few key aspects were mentioned. Less than two key points were mentioned, and not in great detail.
Poor

The importance of plot structure is not discussed. Aspects such as key events, literary terms, symbols, or plot development are not examined. No key points were mentioned.
Literary Connector

Excellent

Found three fascinating connections to the outside world, and presneted them in a unique way that enhanced the discussion. You asked your team to share their connections afterward.
Fair

Found four topics that connected to the outside world. The presentation reveals lack of self-pride and effort. You simply jotted down notes or copied a website page to share with the rest of your team.
Poor

Found less than four topics that connected to the outside world. The presentation reveals lack of self-pride and effort. You simply jotted down notes or copied a webstie page to share with the rest of your team.
Literary Luminary

Excellent

Spotlighted at least four interesting, powerful, funny, puzzling, and important information from the text. You included the paragraph and page number. You gave a great reason for choosing those texts.
Fair

Spotlighted three interesting, powerful, funny, puzzling, important information from the text. You included the paragraph and page number. You gave a ok reason for choosing those texts.
Poor

Spotlighted two or fewer interesting, powerful, funny, puzzling, important information from the text. You included the paragraph and page number. You gave little or no reason for choosing those texts.
Investigator

Excellent

A specific topic was focused on, and the research that was done was thorough and was linked to the novel.
Fair

A specific topic was focused on, but research was sparse and not well done.
Poor

Didn't write on any specific topic. Resarch was less than two paragraphs and was poorly documented and written.
Travel Tracker

Excellent

The Beginning and end of the action, along with key events, were described fully. Page numbers were used. Settings were described in detail.
Fair

Described some of the beginning of the action, the end, and the places where key events took place- but description was incomplete or lacking. Some page numbers were absent, and settings, while mentioned, were not described in detail.
Poor

Did not describe the begining of the action, the end, and the places where key events took place. Did not mention page numbers. Did not describe settings in detail.



Keywords:
  • literature circles

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232