Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Honors Poetry Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Honors Poetry Analysis
Rubric Code:
M5W855
By
arbobro13
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Poetry Analysis Rubric
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Excellent
8 pts
Introduction
Poor
Lacks one or more of the following elements: specific attention getter, logical progression of ideas, author's name and title of poem.
Fair
Uses a specific attention getter. Links the attention getter to the thesis through a logical progression of ideas. Includes some necessary elements.
Good
Uses specific and interesting attention getter. Links attention getter to the thesis through a logical progression of ideas. Mentions the author and title of the piece.
Excellent
Uses an interesting attention getter, the intro flows and explains main topics of the analysis. Mentions the author and title of the piece.
Thesis
Poor
There is no clear thesis statement or the thesis is not linked to other ideas in the introduction.
Fair
The thesis statement is not clear and may or may not be linked to other ideas in the introduction. Revisement is necessary.
Good
There is specific and clear thesis statement which is linked to the other ideas of the introduction. Some revisement may be necessary.
Excellent
There is a specific and clear thesis statement which is clearly linked to the other ideas of the introduction. No revisement is necessary.
Poetic Analysis 1
Poor
Poetic device is not explained and little evidence from the poem is used. Analysis is very weak. Topic sentences is not present and little critical thinking is evident.
Fair
Explains poetic device but may not use evidence from the poem. Analysis is weak. Topic sentence may or may not be present and little critical thinking is evident.
Good
Explains poetic device and uses evidence from the poem but may not be specific. Topic sentence is present and some critical thinking is evident.
Excellent
Explains poetic device thoroughly and uses precise evidence from the poem. Topic sentence is clear and concise and critically thinking is evident.
Poetic Analysis 2
Poor
Poetic device is not explained and little evidence from the poem is used. Analysis is very weak. Topic sentences is not present and little critical thinking is evident.
Fair
Explains poetic device but may not use evidence from the poem. Analysis is weak. Topic sentence may or may not be present and little critical thinking is evident.
Good
Explains poetic device and uses evidence from the poem but may not be specific. Topic sentence is present and some critical thinking is evident.
Excellent
Explains poetic device thoroughly and uses precise evidence from the poem. Topic sentence is clear and concise and critically thinking is evident.
Poetic Analysis 3
Poor
Poetic device is not explained and little evidence from the poem is used. Analysis is very weak. Topic sentences is not present and little critical thinking is evident.
Fair
Explains poetic device but may not use evidence from the poem. Analysis is weak. Topic sentence may or may not be present and little critical thinking is evident.
Good
Explains poetic device and uses evidence from the poem but may not be specific. Topic sentence is present and some critical thinking is evident.
Excellent
Explains poetic device thoroughly and uses precise evidence from the poem. Topic sentence is clear and concise and critically thinking is evident.
Conclusion
Poor
Conclusion either restates the thesis in the exact same words or conclusion is not developed enough. Leaves reader feeling there should be more to the paper. May or may not bring up a new topic not previously discussed.
Fair
Conclusion restates the thesis differently than in the introduction. Conclusion is adequately developed. Does not bring up a new topic not previously discussed.
Good
Restates the thesis differently than in the introduction. Conclusion is fully developed and brings a sense of closure to the piece. Does not bring up any new ideas not previously discussed.
Excellent
Restates the thesis differently than in the introduction in a creative, well-thought out manner. Provides the reader with a clear sense of the poetry analysis and brings a sense of closure to the paper.
Evidence
Poor
Lack of citations in analysis. No explanation of citations is present (0-1 citations)
Fair
Some citations are present. Citations are not fully explained. (1-2 citations)
Good
Citations are fully explained and are present throughout the analysis (3-4 citations)
Excellent
Many citations are used to support the thesis and meaning of the poem. Goes beyond expectations by providing the reader with clear evidence (4+ citations)
Grammar/Spelling
Poor
Paper has 7+ grammar or spelling mistakes.
Fair
Paper has 5-7 grammar or spelling mistakes.
Good
Paper has 1-4 grammar or spelling mistakes.
Excellent
Paper is grammar and spelling error free.
Organizer
Poor
Does not include poetry organizer.
Fair
Includes a poetry organizer but is not complete.
Good
Includes a completed poetry organizer.
Excellent
Includes a completed poetry organizer that is thorough and well thought out.
Effort
Poor
Little effort is evident. Paper is not typed and/or messy. Paper is very short (less than 2 pages double spaced)
Fair
Some effort is evident. Paper typed but may be messy. Paper is short (less than 2.5 pages double spaced)
Good
Obvious effort is evident. Paper is typed, nate and of appropriate length (2.5+ pages double spaced)
Excellent
Effort is beyond expectations and it is clear a lot of time and thought was put into the analysis. Paper is neat, typed, includes a cover page and is of appropriate length (2.5+ pages double spaced)
Punctuality
Poor
Paper is 5+ days late
Fair
Paper is 3-4 days late
Good
Paper is 1-2 days late
Excellent
Paper is turned in on time
Subjects:
English
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.