Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The Burning Question of Interpretation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The Burning Question of Interpretation
The Great Debate - Tuck Everlasting
Debate Rubric to give an idea of debate requirements for those who have never debated. This debate is concerning 2 opposting intrepretations of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451.
Rubric Code:
M52439
By
alixmcgeehan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Understanding of Topic
2 pts
Excellent
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information convincingly.
Good
The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
Fair
The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
Poor
The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Opening Statement
1 pts
Excellent
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Good
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Fair
Opening statement attempts to clearly define the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points.
Poor
Opening statement doesn't define the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Questions
1 pts
Excellent
All questions clearly expresses their viewpoint in a highly persuasive manner.
Good
Most questions clearly expresses their viewpoint in a somewhat interesting way.
Fair
Some questions attempt to clearly express their viewpoint.
Poor
None of the questions attempt to clearly express their viewpoint.
Rebuttal Answers
1 pts
Excellent
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant to the questions and strong. Was able to accurately defend position.
Good
Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant to the questions and strong. Was able to defend position.
Fair
Some of counter arguments were accurate, relevant to the questions and strong. Was somewhat able to defend position.
Poor
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Was unable to defend position.
Evidence from the Text
2 pts
Excellent
All arguements were supported with examples from the text or other reputable resources.
Good
Most of the arguements were supported with examples from the text or other reputable resources.
Fair
A few of the arguements were supported with examples from the text or other reputable resources.
Poor
None of the arguements were supported with examples from the text or other reputable resources.
Concluding Statement
1 pts
Excellent
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Good
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Fair
Opening statement attempts to clearly sum up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points.
Poor
Opening statement doesn't sum up the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Respect for Other Team
1 pts
Excellent
All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Good
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Fair
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Poor
Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Planning Worksheet
1 pts
Excellent
The planning worksheet was filled out completely with attached documents and handed in before the debate.
Good
The planning worksheet was filled out with most of the attached documents and handed in before the debate.
Fair
The planning worksheet was partly filled out, with a few of the attached documents and handed in before the debate.
Poor
The worksheet was not filled out or not handed in before the debate.
Subjects:
English
Education
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.