Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Peer Review- Short Story rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Peer Review- Short Story
Peer Review- Short Story
Rubric Code:
M523B2
By
aephil
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Personal Essay
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
5 pts
Familiarity
Poor
This story seems familiar. In fact, you think you may have watched the movie or read the book. Write the title and call Mrs. Phillips over.
Fair
Some elements of the story seem very familiar. If the elements are recognizable from a movie or book, write the title and call Mrs. Phillips over.
Good
This is very obviously an original, fictional story, so no need to call Mrs. Phillips over.
Plot
Poor
The plot seems to be poorly planned and is unclear or not appropriate.
Fair
The plot has been given thought and worked on, but could be more fully developed.
Good
The plot has been carefully selected and fully developed.
Elements of Plot
Poor
Elements of Plot are MIA. Murky exposition; incomplete rising action, boring climax, no falling action, and a nonsensical or irrelevant resolution- or none at all.
Fair
Three out of five elements of plot are clearly evident in this piece. List the two that aren't so the writer can fix them.
Good
All of the elements of plot are clearly visible in this story and correctly used.
Characters
Poor
The difference between antagonist and protagonist is unclear or non-existent. No dynamic character. The characters are flat and unengaging.
Fair
The antagonist and protagonist are clearly defined. There is an attempt made at a dynamic character. The characters are reasonably interesting.
Good
The antagonist and protagonist are clearly defined. There is a dynamic character. The characters are interesting.
Organization
Poor
The story is poorly organized and does not flow well. It is hard to follow the development of the writer's ideas.
Fair
The story is generally well organized, but some places need refinement. It is generally easy to follow the development of the writer's ideas.
Good
The story flows very well and needs little reorganization. It is very easy to follow the development of the writer's ideas.
Sentence Fluency
Poor
Sentences are short and choppy, or are run-ons. They do not express complete ideas, or express them poorly.
Fair
There are a few run-ons or fragments, but most sentences are correct and express complete ideas adequately.
Good
There is a variety of sentence types, but very few or no run-ons or fragments. Sentences create an impact and express ideas well.
GUM
Poor
11 or more grammar, usage, or mechanics errors. There are numerous capitalization errors or punctuation errors. There are several instances of double negatives.
Fair
6-10 grammar, usage, or mechanics errors. Correct capitalization and punctuation are used. There are only one or two double negatives.
Good
0-5 grammar, usage, or mechanics errors. Words are always or nearly always properly capitalized. Correct punctuation is always or nearly always used. No double negatives.
Vocabulary
Poor
There are 11 or more spelling errors. Words are consistently used incorrectly. Better word choices need to be made.
Fair
There are 6-10 spelling errors. Words are generally used correctly. Most of the word choices are good, but a few could be refined.
Good
There are 0-5 spelling errors. Words are always or nearly always used correctly. The words chosen assist in creating the tone for which the writer strives.
Format
Poor
Not double-spaced; no paragraph breaks; lacking title.
Fair
Double-spacing is incorrect or not found throughout the whole paper; paragraph breaks are included; title is present but not formatted correctly.
Good
Story is double-spaced throughout; paragraphs are indented correctly; title is centered and capitalized correctly.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.